All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Marxmeier <mike@msede.com>
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM in the Linux kernel
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:09:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38443D15.59D9D47A@msede.com> (raw)

Forwarded message from A James Lewis <james@vr1-workhorse1.vrtx.net>

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Where do I find an overview and/or examples of it's use?  how does it
co-exist with the RAID0145 patch?

I understand the reasons for not including anything new at this
stage...
RAID was very nearly included but I think we're going to wait for 2.4
now....

2.4 seems likley to be here in the next few months... so perhaps it's
best
to wait.

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:

> 
> Hi Ole,
> 
> Linus gets the LVM kernel patches since several months,
> he is aware of our petition (more than 1000 nice people on it 8*),
> he got triggered by Dirk Hohndel of SuSE several times
> 
> _but_
> 
> he didn't give any statement at _all_ directly to me or on any list 8*(((
> 
> IMHO the inclusion of LVM in the SuSE distribution will help a lot...
> 
> Regards,
> Heinz
> 
> 
> > Just one small question:
> > The current 2.3.x kernels do, to the best of knowledge, not
> > contain LVM. And isn't it so that Linus has closed the kernel
> > for new additions/features until the release of 2.4.0? I seem to
> > have read somwhere that it is now too late to get anything
> > radically new into the kernel, at least until development start 
> > on 2.5.x kernels. Am I mistaken, or does this mean that it will
> > be some time before we see LVM in a stable kernel? (The fact that
> > for instance S.u.S.E. is shipping a kernel with LVM support helps,
> > but can hardly be said to be satisfactory...).
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> Systemmanagement CS-TS                           T-Nova
>                                                  Entwicklungszentrum Darmstadt
> Heinz Mauelshagen                                Otto-Roehm-Strasse 71c
> Senior Systems Engineer                          Postfach 10 05 41
>                                                  64205 Darmstadt
> mge@ez-darmstadt.telekom.de                      Germany
>                                                  +49 6151 886-425
>                                                           FAX-386
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

             reply	other threads:[~1999-11-30 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-11-30 21:09 Michael Marxmeier [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-12-02  1:13 [linux-lvm] LVM in the Linux kernel Fernando Dammous
1999-12-02 22:05 ` Harald Milz
1999-11-30 14:48 Ole Jakob Skjelten
1999-11-30 16:03 ` Heinz Mauelshagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38443D15.59D9D47A@msede.com \
    --to=mike@msede.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.