From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, longtb5@viettel.com.vn,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] latencystats: fix timestamp marking and latency calculation
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38519281.CEthSRxIAY@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537887086-19960-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>
25/09/2018 16:51, Reshma Pattan:
> Latency calculation logic is not correct for the case where
> packets gets dropped before TX. As for the dropped packets,
> the timestamp is not cleared, and such packets still gets
> counted for latency calculation in next runs, that will result
> in inaccurate latency measurement.
>
> So fix this issue as below,
>
> Before setting timestamp in mbuf, check mbuf don't have
> any prior valid time stamp flag set and after marking
> the timestamp, set mbuf flags to indicate timestamp is
> valid.
>
> Before calculating timestamp check mbuf flags are set to
> indicate timestamp is valid.
>
> With the above logic it is guaranteed that correct timestamps
> have been used.
>
> Fixes: 5cd3cac9ed ("latency: added new library for latency stats")
>
> CC: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
> ---
> v3: style related fix
> v2: remove check for mbuf->timestamp
> ---
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-25 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-21 16:01 [PATCH] latencystats: fix timestamp marking and latency calculation Reshma Pattan
2018-09-22 2:58 ` longtb5
2018-09-24 13:07 ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-25 15:22 ` longtb5
2018-09-24 7:10 ` longtb5
2018-09-25 12:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Reshma Pattan
2018-09-25 14:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-09-25 14:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Reshma Pattan
2018-10-25 8:31 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38519281.CEthSRxIAY@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=longtb5@viettel.com.vn \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.