From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sandeep suresh Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:20:01 +0530 (IST) Subject: [U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation In-Reply-To: <4C7380C8.3020901@emk-elektronik.de> References: <920899.1081.qm@web137419.mail.in.yahoo.com> <4C7282FB.9020008@emk-elektronik.de> <616105.24678.qm@web137419.mail.in.yahoo.com> <4C7380C8.3020901@emk-elektronik.de> Message-ID: <388694.21216.qm@web137417.mail.in.yahoo.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Reinhard Meyer & All, ?????????????? Apology for not sending to the mailing list; forwarding the same to the mailing list. There is already a #define CONFIG_AT91SAM9260ek 1 in /include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h. I will check further. Please help me if you have any clue further. Thanks & regards Sandeep Suresh. ________________________________ From: Reinhard Meyer To: sandeep suresh ; u-boot Sent: Tue, 24 August, 2010 1:50:24 PM Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation Dear sandeep suresh, > Dear Reinhard Meyer, > Appreciate your quick response. I had done this earlier > before posting this mail, but with the same problem: > step 1) export PATH=$PATH:/work/arm/4.3.2/bin > step 2) make distclean > step 3) make AT91SAM9260ek_config > step 4)make > Can you please help me further, please. I can't help you with the following tasks: 1. find out what are the differences between 9260-EK and 9G20-EK ? 2. find out what subtle differences might exist between 9260 and 9G20 SoC? It might be more than "AT91SAM9G20 = 400MHz version of? AT91SAM9260"... And I can't see in above transcript where you set the #define I mentioned. "#ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20EK" exists in various places in the source, but I do not know if that ever was a really working port or just someone starting on it. Reinhard PS: it is mandatory to post replies to the mailing list as well!