From: Michael Marxmeier <mike@msede.com>
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] Couple of question/confusion
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3895A6A4.345BA093@msede.com> (raw)
Forwarded message ...
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Volker Abele, HP" <Volker_Abele@hp.com>
To: "Scott Walker" <scott@zeroknowledge.com>, <linux-lvm@msede.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] Couple of question/confusion
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:32:09 +0100
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:08:33 MEZ
Message-ID: <001f01bf6bd6$6dd4a8d0$1d7b880f@nsmseva.bbn.hp.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-lvm@msede.com [mailto:owner-linux-lvm@msede.com]On
> Behalf Of Scott Walker
> Sent: Montag, 31. Januar 2000 03:29
> To: linux-lvm@msede.com
> Subject: [linux-lvm] Couple of question/confusion
>
>
> I started playing with LVM tonight and I am impressed... LVM + resierfs
> is nice! But I have a couple problems.
>
> Let me explain (Please offer advice if you want) I have the following
> setup..
> /dev/hdc1 = 1.2G
> /dev/hdd2 = 7.9G
> /dev/hda3 = 1.2G
> /dev/sda1 = 9.11
>
> I wanted to combine all of the above into 1 *partition* for /home. now
> is LVM something I should be looking into or should I just go to linear
> raid? or raid 0?
>
> Now I create my physical volume, but when I want to create my logical I
> keep recieving this error:
>
> freedom /# lvcreate -L100G freedom
> lvcreate -- only 499 free physical extents in volume group "freedom"
-L100G means 100 Gigabyte, that�s just a little bit to much (I think
you
only
have 1.2 + 7.9 + 1.2 + 9.1 = 19.4 G - if I�m right).
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Please offer some advice, wether LVM is just overkill for me and I
> should just use raid0 or linear.
>
>
> --
> Scott Walker Zero Knowledge Systems Inc.
> scott@zeroknowledge.com
http://www.zeroknowledge.com
There are three kinds of people: Those who can count & those who
can't.
next reply other threads:[~2000-01-31 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-31 15:13 Michael Marxmeier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-01-31 2:28 [linux-lvm] Couple of question/confusion Scott Walker
2000-01-31 3:14 ` Daniel Whicker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3895A6A4.345BA093@msede.com \
--to=mike@msede.com \
--cc=Volker_Abele@hp.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.