From: Rich West <rwest@colltech.com>
To: Info <info@amberjack.net>
Cc: linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: LinuxPPC vs. RedHat???
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:11:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38BD4123.F49B678D@colltech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: v04220801b4e2e259e1dd@[10.0.43.218]
The best person to answer your question would be Jason Haas at LinuxPPC,
Inc. He'd be able to give you both an honest answer and a politically
correct one. :)
Just my 2 cents, but I don't think you will have any problems integrating
LinuxPPC in a Redhat environment (I did it at home.. in fact, it's the
reverse. I introduced a Redhat box into a LinuxPPC environment shortly
after I got my RHCE).
LinuxPPC is very close to RedHat 6.1. Sure, there are some minor
differences, but those are mostly related to dealing directly with the
architecture differences.
Java is a touchy subject.. so far, with the Blackdown port, things seem
rather stable and reliable. However I am not the person to even put my 2
cents in on this one.. :)
-Rich
Info wrote:
> I need to buy a workstation for Linux development (C++,JAVA,PERL,etc)
> and would like to buy a Mac instead of Wintel.
>
> -Is LinuxPPC 2000 on par with RedHat 6.1?
> -Other than recompiling on wintel for delivery, can anyone see
> potential problems with using LinuxPPC in a RedHat shop?
> -Any known problems with JAVA tools (JDK, JSDK, Tomcat)?
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-01 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-01 15:12 LinuxPPC vs. RedHat??? Info
2000-03-01 16:11 ` Rich West [this message]
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000301091552.2277C-100000@deepspace.mklinux.org>
2000-03-01 18:24 ` Matt Porter
2000-03-01 20:28 ` Bill Brooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-01 17:31 John L Grantham
2000-03-01 19:28 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-03-01 22:33 ` Tony Mantler
2000-03-01 19:31 John L Grantham
2000-03-01 19:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-01 20:07 ` Renaud Dreyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38BD4123.F49B678D@colltech.com \
--to=rwest@colltech.com \
--cc=info@amberjack.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=rwest@wesmo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.