* [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server?
@ 2000-02-29 17:06 Andrew Shugg
2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Shugg @ 2000-02-29 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
Greetings noble list dwellers,
I have emerged from my long lurk to ask for some help on a vaguely related
issue. I have my eye on a K200 which has been decommissioned, but the
company won't let go of it until someone ("official") can tell them what
it's worth. I've been waiting for them to just give up and sell it to me
very cheaply, but I don't want to miss my chance.
The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220.
I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model
never existed then it's probably a 220. =)
My understanding is that it has a single CPU, either 128 or 256MB of RAM,
and around 16GB of disk. It also has in it some kind of cradle or something
for putting more memory into it - something that is (apparently) not usually
included with such a beast.
This is in Australia, but if anyone can name a figure in their local currency
I'll work it out.
When or if I get it, it will be joining my HP 375/125 in helping with testing
for the parisc-linux project, hence the vague relation to this list. =)
Thanks in advance,
Andrew.
P.S. A quick attempt with HP's on-line calculator says that a new base-line
K-class (K360, 1 CPU, 1GB RAM, 9GB disk) would cost AUS$85,000. Eek.
--
Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh."
[ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* RE: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg @ 2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy 2000-02-29 18:06 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? rob hoppe 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert Womack @ 2000-02-29 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Andrew Shugg', parisc-linux Andrew, I too am a lurker in the shadows, but thanks for asking a question for which I may have part of an answer. I help HP UNIX salespeople and so have some resources. Value, of course, is what one will pay for something. In the case of a K200, the answer is, "Not much." You may be able to find a broker on the web who will give you an offer and the offer will be slight. If you were purchasing a new HP machine [in the US, naturally], say a D-Class or cheap L-Class HP would write you a check for $US 1,800 (about AUS$ 2,900); if you were buying a top K-Class or N-Class, HP would give you $US 6,000 (about AUS$ 9,250). In my experience, this is generally no better than you could get from a broker. Regards, Rob Womack -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shugg [mailto:andrew@neep.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 12:07 PM To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Greetings noble list dwellers, I have emerged from my long lurk to ask for some help on a vaguely related issue. I have my eye on a K200 which has been decommissioned, but the company won't let go of it until someone ("official") can tell them what it's worth. I've been waiting for them to just give up and sell it to me very cheaply, but I don't want to miss my chance. The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220. I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model never existed then it's probably a 220. =) My understanding is that it has a single CPU, either 128 or 256MB of RAM, and around 16GB of disk. It also has in it some kind of cradle or something for putting more memory into it - something that is (apparently) not usually included with such a beast. This is in Australia, but if anyone can name a figure in their local currency I'll work it out. When or if I get it, it will be joining my HP 375/125 in helping with testing for the parisc-linux project, hence the vague relation to this list. =) Thanks in advance, Andrew. P.S. A quick attempt with HP's on-line calculator says that a new base-line K-class (K360, 1 CPU, 1GB RAM, 9GB disk) would cost AUS$85,000. Eek. -- Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh." [ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe: send e-mail to parisc-linux-request@thepuffingroup.com with `unsubscribe' as the subject. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg 2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack @ 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy 2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler ` (2 more replies) 2000-02-29 18:06 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? rob hoppe 2 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: willy @ 2000-02-29 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Shugg; +Cc: parisc-linux On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 01:06:47AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220. > I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model > never existed then it's probably a 220. =) I've just been going through The List of hardware, bashing the hw database into something more sane. The K200 did exist, codenamed `Kittyhawk' with a 100MHz PA7200 CPU in it. It has an NIO bus in it which is something we don't have documentation on yet (also known as HP-PB, I think). The K-class machines probably wont work very soon, but I suspect someone will eventually get them working. Mention the cost of getting a support contract on it if you need to scare management into dropping the price :-) > When or if I get it, it will be joining my HP 375/125 in helping with testing > for the parisc-linux project, hence the vague relation to this list. =) 300 series... aarrrgghh :-) 300/400 series machines are m68k based. We are sharing their HIL keyboard driver (share in the sense of `copied and made changes but will merge back later' sense), and Steve Shack mentioned something about the 300-series STI interface recently. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy @ 2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler 2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg 2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Grant Grundler @ 2000-02-29 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: willy; +Cc: Andrew Shugg, parisc-linux willy@thepuffingroup.com wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 01:06:47AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > > The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220. > > I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model > > never existed then it's probably a 220. =) > > I've just been going through The List of hardware, bashing the hw database > into something more sane. The K200 did exist, codenamed `Kittyhawk' with > a 100MHz PA7200 CPU in it. It has an NIO bus in it which is something > we don't have documentation on yet (also known as HP-PB, I think). > The K-class machines probably wont work very soon, but I suspect someone > will eventually get them working. Think of the K-class as a C-class (eg. C100) with HP-PB instead of EISA. But forget the HP-PB. Very few cards are made for it and most are HP proprietary. At least all the HP-PB SCSI boards are. The problem is not getting the cards - getting a device driver will be difficult unless someone in HP is a masochist and wants to write one. Not me. Kittyhawks also have GSC "slots". The core I/O board has one "slot" and the Harrier board has room for 4 more GSC cards. IIRC, TPG has a dozen or so gigabit ethernet cards which would fit nicely on a harrier. I suspect Andrew was refering to a Harrier board. I have no clue what the actual value of a K200 is. One should be able to upgrade the system to something faster than 100Mhz and add CPU's. I'm just not sure it's worth it. Compare to a C3000 or B1000 before going that route. grant Grant Grundler Unix Development Lab +1.408.447.7253 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy 2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler @ 2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg 2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack 2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy 2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris 2 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Andrew Shugg @ 2000-02-29 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: parisc-linux First of all, thanks to two Robs (Womack and Hoppe), Willy and Grant for their feedback. With any luck I'll be able to talk 'em into a cheap deal - especially seeing as it's costing them a fair whack per month for floor space rental in a data centre, even though it's switched off ... Willy also said: > 300 series... aarrrgghh :-) 300/400 series machines are m68k based. > We are sharing their HIL keyboard driver (share in the sense of `copied > and made changes but will merge back later' sense), and Steve Shack > mentioned something about the 300-series STI interface recently. I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy. Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel. Had me a look at the HW database, and it says the 375 carries a 'PA7000' processor. (As a side note, the link for this in the database, "http://216.208.98.4/view.php3?type=cpu&name=PA7000 (PCX-S)", made my proxy server unhappy. Dropping the " (PCX-S)" off the end of it helped.) Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip? Showing my ignorance, Andrew. -- Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh." [ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* RE: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg @ 2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack 2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert Womack @ 2000-02-29 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Andrew Shugg', parisc-linux Andrew, The PA7000 is indeed a PA-RISC microprocessor, a 32biter. The series that begin with 8 (PA8n00) are the 64bit types. Regards, rob womack -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shugg [mailto:andrew@neep.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 6:49 PM To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? First of all, thanks to two Robs (Womack and Hoppe), Willy and Grant for their feedback. With any luck I'll be able to talk 'em into a cheap deal - especially seeing as it's costing them a fair whack per month for floor space rental in a data centre, even though it's switched off ... Willy also said: > 300 series... aarrrgghh :-) 300/400 series machines are m68k based. > We are sharing their HIL keyboard driver (share in the sense of `copied > and made changes but will merge back later' sense), and Steve Shack > mentioned something about the 300-series STI interface recently. I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy. Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel. Had me a look at the HW database, and it says the 375 carries a 'PA7000' processor. (As a side note, the link for this in the database, "http://216.208.98.4/view.php3?type=cpu&name=PA7000 (PCX-S)", made my proxy server unhappy. Dropping the " (PCX-S)" off the end of it helped.) Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip? Showing my ignorance, Andrew. -- Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh." [ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe: send e-mail to parisc-linux-request@thepuffingroup.com with `unsubscribe' as the subject. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg 2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack @ 2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy 2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: willy @ 2000-03-01 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Shugg; +Cc: parisc-linux On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:48:49AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy. > Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting > their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel. Do you perhaps mean the 735 and 715? > Had me a look at the HW database, and it says the 375 carries a 'PA7000' > processor. (As a side note, the link for this in the database, > "http://216.208.98.4/view.php3?type=cpu&name=PA7000 (PCX-S)", made my proxy > server unhappy. Dropping the " (PCX-S)" off the end of it helped.) This is a bug which we fixed earlier this afternoon (that should have been `%20' instead of the space character). There are still pending changes to the hw database that will make it closer to being correct. At least the PA8000/8200/8500 chips should be correct (there may be omissions, but there should not be incorrect chips in those categories). > Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip? Yes, it is. To complicate matters, there are PA7000 CPUs which implement the PA1.0 architecture (PCX) and PA7000 CPUs which implement the PA1.1 architecture (PCX-S). The intention is to support the latter and not the former. > Showing my ignorance, Less than a year ago, I didn't know the difference between a PA1.0 and PA1.1 machine :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy @ 2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg 2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Andrew Shugg @ 2000-03-02 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: parisc-linux willy@thepuffingroup.com said: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:48:49AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > > I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy. > > Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting > > their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel. > > Do you perhaps mean the 735 and 715? Ahah - brilliant! This indeed what I meant. Thanks. > > Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip? > > Yes, it is. To complicate matters, there are PA7000 CPUs which implement > the PA1.0 architecture (PCX) and PA7000 CPUs which implement the PA1.1 > architecture (PCX-S). The intention is to support the latter and not > the former. > > Less than a year ago, I didn't know the difference between a PA1.0 and > PA1.1 machine :-) Okay. =) Is it clear at this point what is definitely going to be supported (even if it doesn't work now), and what will _never_ be supported? (ie, basically, what has 1.0 and what has 1.1?) Andrew. -- Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh." [ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg @ 2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy 2000-03-02 18:15 ` Stan Sieler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: willy @ 2000-03-02 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Shugg; +Cc: parisc-linux On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 09:02:12PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > Okay. =) Is it clear at this point what is definitely going to be supported > (even if it doesn't work now), and what will _never_ be supported? (ie, > basically, what has 1.0 and what has 1.1?) Well, I'm glad you asked me that :-) I've just spent a fair bit of time, with Dave Kennedy's help, updating the PARISC Hardware Database. If you click on the `PA-7000 (PCX)' link under `CPU types', you'll see that Stan Sieler is going to be disappointed that he hung on to his 834, but his 705 will work nicely as it's a PA-7000 (PCX-S). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy @ 2000-03-02 18:15 ` Stan Sieler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Stan Sieler @ 2000-03-02 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: willy; +Cc: Andrew Shugg, parisc-linux Re: > `CPU types', you'll see that Stan Sieler is going to be disappointed that > he hung on to his 834, but his 705 will work nicely as it's a PA-7000 > (PCX-S). We keep the 9000/834 as our HP-UX 10.10 test machine... last year, it was turned on for about 10 days (out of 365). This year, we haven't turned it on yet :) No...I don't intend to run Linux on it...too slow! -- Stan Sieler sieler@allegro.com www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html www.allegro.com/sieler ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy 2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler 2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg @ 2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris [not found] ` <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Sandy Harris @ 2000-03-01 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Shugg; +Cc: parisc-linux willy@thepuffingroup.com wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 01:06:47AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > > The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220. > > I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model > > never existed then it's probably a 220. =) > > I've just been going through The List of hardware, bashing the hw database > into something more sane. The K200 did exist, codenamed `Kittyhawk' with > a 100MHz PA7200 CPU in it. I don't know these servers, but I've a friend who deals machines of about that generation, buying them in truckload lots and reselling. Recent prices from him, in Canadian $: RAM disk monitor quantity 712/60 128 no no 16 $ 50 apiece. 715/100 256 no 19" 1 $200 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca>]
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? [not found] ` <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca> @ 2000-03-05 23:01 ` Sandy Harris 2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Sandy Harris @ 2000-03-05 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: parisc-linux; +Cc: Steve Shack, tkorycki, jawildman Steve Shack wrote: > > Sandy Harris wrote: > > > I don't know these servers, but I've a friend who deals machines of about > > that generation, buying them in truckload lots and reselling. Recent > > prices from him, in Canadian $: > > > > RAM disk monitor quantity > > 712/60 128 no no 16 $ 50 apiece. > > 715/100 256 no 19" 1 $200 > > If he can find me a 712/100 with 128+megs ram i'd buy that in a > second. Care to pass that on to him? I bought the only 100 I've seen so far and have already told him I'll take all the 712/100s he gets. They seem to be mostly 60s. 712s take 128 maximum RAM. 715s can go to 256 and have room for more drives. My guess is a 715/100 might suit you. I waited to respond to this, and the other messages asking for details, until I had his permission to post his email address: jan@magma.ca Location is a small town outside Ottawa. He also has lots of Suns, if anyone here cares :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-03-05 23:01 ` Sandy Harris @ 2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence 2000-03-06 2:22 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server T. Martin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Barrie Spence @ 2000-03-05 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sandy; +Cc: parisc-linux, sshack, tkorycki, jawildman Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca> wrote: > 712s take > 128 maximum RAM. 715s can go to 256 and have room for more drives. My > guess is a 715/100 might suit you. A 712/100 should have 6 RAM slots giving up to 192Mb. Barrie -- Barrie Spence Sanity Clause? There is no Sanity Clause Home: b.spence@ieee.org Telephone +44 1506 442304 Play: barrie_spence@agilent.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server 2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence @ 2000-03-06 2:22 ` T. Martin 2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: T. Martin @ 2000-03-06 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: parisc-linux On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Barrie Spence wrote: > Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca> wrote: > > 712s take > > 128 maximum RAM. 715s can go to 256 and have room for more drives. My > > guess is a 715/100 might suit you. > > A 712/100 should have 6 RAM slots giving up to 192Mb. > Exactly what kind of Ram does the 715 series use, I tried some in a PC and it doesn't work. I get about 48 megs extra from old boxes in 8 meg simms. Terry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server 2000-03-06 2:22 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server T. Martin @ 2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke 2000-03-07 0:00 ` Barrie Spence 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Frank Benke @ 2000-03-06 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: T. Martin; +Cc: parisc-linux "T. Martin" schrieb: > On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Barrie Spence wrote: > > > Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca> wrote: > > > 712s take > > > 128 maximum RAM. 715s can go to 256 and have room for more drives. My > > > guess is a 715/100 might suit you. > > > > A 712/100 should have 6 RAM slots giving up to 192Mb. > > > > Exactly what kind of Ram does the 715 series use, I tried some in a PC > and it doesn't work. I get about 48 megs extra from old boxes in 8 meg > simms. > > Terry > afaik: the 715 have special memories, which look like ps2 but aren't. i'm not even sure if the 712 and 715 use the same simms. you should definitely look for dedicated 715 memories. i have the same problem with 735s, which use their own memory design. regards frank > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe: send e-mail to parisc-linux-request@thepuffingroup.com with > `unsubscribe' as the subject. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server 2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke @ 2000-03-07 0:00 ` Barrie Spence 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Barrie Spence @ 2000-03-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frank.benke; +Cc: catfish, parisc-linux Frank Benke <frank.benke@web.de> wrote: > > afaik: the 715 have special memories, which look like ps2 but aren't. definitely > i'm not even sure if the 712 and 715 use the same simms. you should > definitely look for dedicated 715 memories. 712/715 RAM is compatible, though I believe that the 712s and the newer 715s used slightly faster specs than the original 715/{33,55,75}s. > i have the same problem with 735s, which use their own > memory design. The 735 memory is the same as 720/730/750/755 if it helps, but note that the 720/730 machines can't use the higher density modules introduced with the 735/755 machines. Barrie -- Barrie Spence Sanity Clause? There is no Sanity Clause Home: b.spence@ieee.org Telephone +44 1506 442304 Play: barrie_spence@agilent.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? 2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg 2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack 2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy @ 2000-02-29 18:06 ` rob hoppe 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: rob hoppe @ 2000-02-29 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Shugg; +Cc: parisc-linux Andrew Shugg wrote: > Greetings noble list dwellers, > > I have emerged from my long lurk to ask for some help on a vaguely related > issue. I have my eye on a K200 which has been decommissioned, but the > company won't let go of it until someone ("official") can tell them what > it's worth. I've been waiting for them to just give up and sell it to me > very cheaply, but I don't want to miss my chance. > > The lowest-numbered K class machine I can find on HP's website is a K220. > I'm fairly sure the machine I've looked at is a K200, but if this model > never existed then it's probably a 220. =) > > My understanding is that it has a single CPU, either 128 or 256MB of RAM, > and around 16GB of disk. It also has in it some kind of cradle or something > for putting more memory into it - something that is (apparently) not usually > included with such a beast. > > This is in Australia, but if anyone can name a figure in their local currency > I'll work it out. > > When or if I get it, it will be joining my HP 375/125 in helping with testing > for the parisc-linux project, hence the vague relation to this list. =) > > Thanks in advance, > > Andrew. > > P.S. A quick attempt with HP's on-line calculator says that a new base-line > K-class (K360, 1 CPU, 1GB RAM, 9GB disk) would cost AUS$85,000. Eek. > > -- > Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/ > > "Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself." > "Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh." > [ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe: send e-mail to parisc-linux-request@thepuffingroup.com with > `unsubscribe' as the subject. If you can send the info to troy@flagshiptech.com he can tell you the value in $US. The tray you are talking about is a memory carrier. It is faster with two memory carriers. The model number is inside of the door on a label. If you can provide the model number on the memory troy can tell you the size. You can call troy at 7705698188. Let him know rob sent you his way. Rob -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ Rob Hoppe _/ _/ 770-995-5099 _/ _/ 770-560-1050 cell _/ _/ 770-338-5885 fax _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-03-07 1:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg
2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack
2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy
2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler
2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg
2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack
2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy
2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg
2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy
2000-03-02 18:15 ` Stan Sieler
2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris
[not found] ` <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca>
2000-03-05 23:01 ` Sandy Harris
2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence
2000-03-06 2:22 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server T. Martin
2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Barrie Spence
2000-02-29 18:06 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? rob hoppe
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.