From: Michel Dänzer <michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>,
Kostas Gewrgiou <gewrgiou@imbc.gr>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work onppcwithr128
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:52:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38CBAF43.B9F7D50@iiic.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.10.10003111521590.14494-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I'll try that. But the results I get with X -probeonly are more than
> confusing. After I tosses out most of the driver modules,
Which drivers? Only r128, fbdev and glint are known to be working on PPC
AFAIK.
> the probe runs once or twice, and gets sporadic SIGILL the rest of the time.
> To the extent of not succeeding at all for the rest of the day. Or
> succeeding only from the console but not from a slogin session (signal 4 in
> the slogin session consistently). The signal happens apparently at different
> times during X startup - while loading the dbe module, after loading the
> fbdevhw module.
This is a known bug in the server's cache flush code. There is a fix worked
out by Kostas Gewrgiou and Kevin Hendricks which unfortunately hasn't made it
into 4.0.
> The chip was detected on the PCI bus - what's the BusID supposed to do in
> this situation? Keep X from probing the other PCI devices?
> OK, tried to feed it the BusID (0:17:0 as reported by the probe). Results:
> a beep, and the warnings 'invalid mem allocation' and 'invalid IO
> allocation'. The IO range smells like a port address range, is that
> remapped by the PCI bridge? lspci reports the IO range as disabled. I'll
> look into Geerts description of the Mach64 memory layout to figure out
> what aperture X tries to use here.
Are you trying to use the driver for Mach64?
Try the fbdev driver with the BusID. (Mach is only minimally accelerated ATM
anyway)
Michel
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-12 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003041753480.1870-100000@idd-01.imbc.gr>
2000-03-04 18:55 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwith r128 Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-05 13:42 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-03-05 16:43 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-05 16:58 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-05 21:04 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-05 21:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-05 22:25 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-06 6:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-09 3:11 ` Kevin Hendricks
[not found] ` <38C7A016.8C2ED4C8@iiic.ethz.ch>
[not found] ` <v03110701b562ab7246aa@[129.100.29.243]>
2000-03-10 15:33 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwithr128 Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-10 17:25 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-10 18:17 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-10 19:21 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-10 23:54 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on ppcwithr128 Michel Dänzer
2000-03-11 14:50 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-12 14:52 ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2000-03-10 19:43 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwithr128 David A. Gatwood
2000-03-11 14:38 ` Help! Getting aty128fb.c to work with newest sawtooth machines Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-13 9:19 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-14 1:12 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwith r128 Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-09 2:41 ` Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-09 11:04 ` Gabriel Paubert
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003131026030.29249-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
2000-03-13 12:10 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work onppcwithr128 Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-13 13:05 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-13 16:24 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-13 17:02 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38CBAF43.B9F7D50@iiic.ethz.ch \
--to=michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch \
--cc=gewrgiou@imbc.gr \
--cc=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.