From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:53:52 +0200 Message-ID: <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1442152943-24493-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1698028.ftHN1K8oZa@vostro.rjw.lan> <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64930 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757367AbbI1NZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:25:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Len Brown , Hanjun Guo , Tomasz Nowicki , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> Marc Zyngier (5): > >> acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure > >> irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips > >> irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing > >> clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based > >> clocksources > >> clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing > > > > I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the > > first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and > > clocksource-related patches. > > Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series > later today. > > > Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY > > (currently in my bleeding-edge branch). > > Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you > have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are > still aimed at 4.4)? The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing regression. I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his next version on them. Thanks, Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:53:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure In-Reply-To: <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> References: <1442152943-24493-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1698028.ftHN1K8oZa@vostro.rjw.lan> <560939A7.3030603@arm.com> Message-ID: <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> Marc Zyngier (5): > >> acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure > >> irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips > >> irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing > >> clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based > >> clocksources > >> clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing > > > > I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the > > first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and > > clocksource-related patches. > > Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series > later today. > > > Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY > > (currently in my bleeding-edge branch). > > Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you > have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are > still aimed at 4.4)? The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing regression. I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his next version on them. Thanks, Rafael