From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1DAC32771 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BDC2084D for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="tgH5fkp2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729146AbgAOSqF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:46:05 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com ([209.85.222.175]:47093 "EHLO mail-qk1-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729012AbgAOSqE (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:46:04 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id r14so16610256qke.13 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:46:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbB7MOpyYjrB+/IIeifGANJzaRFxF53ozM2I7mFRGPI=; b=tgH5fkp2vA4dag4nU9VUlxDRStj6Cch4gpsQmX2ru1pMa9gHewKH+G34pEqHnUb4sH HuLgQHOhX1KYl9VCh9LJ69ZxrH+BbDwImKE9eyHpKmC4ZUlJVtH3PaqK3qVKN0tM5Dv6 DOMDu4Lot5GvylTj9BG3gYuDe6QDbtrpJWRF3OHOswbZdYX7NwtiOJOFnySdUP02EIya vRiJorG8M4pzBZZpnBjXeiLBO7U+6NkvGK4mHuZlwvwcwdIDdM+wk2ojg93WJJ7QTr+R Z5g9TQNHz68Tk/4iJgek6Tb9fwGInjVyFHxeOkTwCX46oVXo7bjXdhDVXkN+fTlrCl6v itqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbB7MOpyYjrB+/IIeifGANJzaRFxF53ozM2I7mFRGPI=; b=ELpIW6yuz3HjF2Jsbl3IN/BZz2X4hO5zoVAFcV2O4FmFzfcL4fqQEntp0BF93qXeMH sCsEUGdnM66tyYligRsrjW90t/KXMdRWsK+Ag4nmhmv53x98pQurCjQMfK+lQo1Cb8CV Oy8igai7T8z09J9tx0f0+pOfq75z7P8RokwbIUhNmPwZsjEeqABbJurXxwsEegQgkbgo 1kwoNXDk5VAMRAnVCo1qkhcEOz+pE292vstTV0J89CSXDnBu6ilGropbtLx+GiSAudze 8QUewIndgdC6CSgokfWGJAUYfX6wnVy+L7gaY9XYGn+4bSNIIDkd3obtvOcZ1VOuil7o ikzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUD70ekK8zE/EeNdENMKGvOFJ/H1jjFr9w1lcMDcxPRSA5xspa t14s5HSoEaUbyTjJ6RN1xVdr7arr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgv/yLhe/j2IymLFnC8+z7uz4zHxYrRoF/m4l9meIPC4ktVXP4yInJhSIBOXFEgamfF6ISlg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:4047:: with SMTP id n68mr29349285qka.258.1579113963082; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:282:800:7a:b4a4:d30b:b000:b744? ([2601:282:800:7a:b4a4:d30b:b000:b744]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x34sm9899777qtd.20.2020.01.15.10.46.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:46:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: vrf and multicast is broken in some cases To: Ben Greear , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" References: From: David Ahern Message-ID: <3906c6fe-e7a7-94c1-9d7d-74050084b56e@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:45:59 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 1/15/20 10:57 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > Hello, > > We put two different ports into their own VRF, and then tried to run a > multicast > sender on one and receiver on the other.  The receiver does not receive > anything. > > Is this a known problem? > > If we do a similar setup with policy based routing rules instead of VRF, > then the multicast > test works. > It works for OSPF for example. I have lost track of FRR features that use it, so you will need to specify more details. Are the sender / receiver on the same host?