From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <391090D5.2F3BEF7E@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 22:49:25 +0200
From: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
CC: Steven Hanley <sjh@wibble.net>,
        Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: 2.3.99-pre6 sound hfs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005031223420.18207-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Michael Schmitz wrote:
[]
> > pointing out why hfs is not working, as he obviously was under the
> > assumption it was supposed to work in the latest devel kernels.
>
> So was I until I saw Alan's laundry list. I haven't followed 2.3
> development lately but I recall mention of further changes to the VFS.
> Maybe a diff between 2.3.<last working> and 2.3.<recent> vfat or ext2 code
> shows up something.

>>From my personal mail archive, I see that HFS was already broken in
2.3.18 last September.

--
Martin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/