From: Ricardo Scop <scop@digitel.com.br>
To: "Qsyang" <yangqs@163.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org"
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
"slowforce@21cn.com" <slowforce@21cn.com>,
"wd@denx.de" <wd@denx.de>
Subject: Re[2]: close to porting success.....
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:06:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3921.031215@digitel.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312150217.UAA04849@lists.linuxppc.org>
Hello Qsyang,
Sunday, December 14, 2003, 11:21:08 PM, you wrote:
Q> Thanks a million. My BDI2000 configuration file is quite simple
Q> because i try to keep a "clean" CPU environment when using BDI
Q> Debugger.The config file is printed below:
Q> [INIT]
Q> ; init core register
Q> WSPR 149 0x2006000F ;DER : enable SYSIE for BDI flash progr.
Q> WSPR 638 0xFF000000 ;IMMR : internal memory at 0xFF000000
Q> WSPR 158 0x00000007 ;ICTRL: not serialized, no show cycles
Q> ; init SIU register
Q> WM32 0xFF000000 0x00200400 ;SIUMCR
Q> WM32 0xFF000004 0xFFFFFF03 ;SYPCR :enable bus monitor, disable software watchdog
Q> [TARGET]
Q> CPUTYPE MPC800
Q> CPUCLOCK 50000000 ;the CPU clock rate after processing the init list
Q> ....................
Q> ....................
Q> What's wrong in this file? I don't think anything mentioned here
Q> about UPM, so...?
So, mas guess was wrong :(. SDRAM initialization is done in uBoot...
and works well whilw running with a BDI2000.
Sorry, I'm out of ideas right now :(
Good luck,
-Scop.
>>MPC8xx's sdram initialization is related to UPM init and this is not
>>so simple. Copy the initialization code from BDI2000 to uboot
>>
>>> I am porting U-boot-1.0.0 to my custom MPC8xx board and success is
>>> being expectted coming soon(maybe too conceited^&^). Now i have a
>>> question which describes below. So far it is working fine when i am
>>> using BDI2000 and runing 'BDI>go 0x02800100' in Telnet console,and
>>> then all the U-boot commands are working very well. But when i
>>> disconnected BDI and power on board directly ,U-Boot crasheed after
>>> relocation to RAM. FAQ say that SDRAM initialization is bad ,if
>>> this is the case why it is OK when using BDI to boot it. What's the
>>> difference between the two conditions? Maybe some hardware problem?
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-16 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <200312150217.UAA04849@lists.linuxppc.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3921.031215@digitel.com.br \
--to=scop@digitel.com.br \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=slowforce@21cn.com \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
--cc=yangqs@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.