From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933533AbdDSIWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:22:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55186 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760830AbdDSIWC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:22:02 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com D071A31F405 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com D071A31F405 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:22:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Xishi Qiu , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , wanpeng li , Andrew Morton , hidehiro kawai ez , LKML , Fengtiantian , Xiexiuqi Message-ID: <393949858.14449581.1492590121377.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170419080254.c3j5lwztad2fswwr@gmail.com> References: <586CCA5A.8050607@huawei.com> <586DA529.1040803@huawei.com> <58798201.2@huawei.com> <587F523B.80301@huawei.com> <3d5bf4c2-7415-a976-62fb-ba653f92eada@redhat.com> <20170419080254.c3j5lwztad2fswwr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] x86: call smp vmxoff in smp stop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.4.164.1, 10.4.195.1] Thread-Topic: x86: call smp vmxoff in smp stop Thread-Index: UGHT06RuI908U3VtPEYFj/jGUoGl5Q== X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > On 18/01/2017 12:32, Xishi Qiu wrote: > > > From: Tiantian Feng > > > > > > We need to disable VMX on all CPUs before stop cpu when OS panic, > > > otherwisewe risk hanging up the machine, because the CPU ignore INIT > > > signals when VMX is enabled. In kernel mainline this issue existence. > > Yes, but the changelog is atrcious: > > - title should describe the purpose, not the implementation > > - CPU is spelled 'CPU' once, then 'cpu' _in the same sentence_! > > - typos > > - spelling > > - the last sentence doesn't even parse ... > > Still it's already at V4 and comes with two signoffs and what amounts to a > maintainer Ack?? Well, the v2-v4 were really just about getting the signoffs right. At some point you just get desensitized about the changelog. :( I'll post v5 with a rewritten commit message. Paolo