From: "Richard Hendricks" <richard.hendricks@motorola.com>
To: Kirk Haderlie <khaderlie@vividimage.com>
Cc: "'linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org'"
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
"Frank Fadich (E-mail)" <ffadich@wyle.com>
Subject: Re: Running the 823 FADS board @ 72 MHZ
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 13:56:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39413DC8.C2BE7490@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 319E391E2049D311843500609457383D07FC48@exchange.vividimage.com
I do not know of any *development* board that is running the faster
speed CPU's in 1:1 mode. I *do* know several customers are running
their designs at 66 MHz 1:1. There is also at least 1 customer I
know of running 75 Mhz 1:1 without problems. I wrote an application
note describing how to do a high-speed SDRAM interface to the MPC823.
Hint: PC66 will NOT work at 66 MHz. PC100 in most cases won't even
work at 75 MHz. If you are interested in the app note, I recently
published it on comp.sys.powerpc.tech
Kirk Haderlie wrote:
>
> Are you aware of a development board that is running the faster speed CPU's?
> We need the faster speed for our application.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Hendricks [mailto:richard.hendricks@motorola.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 9:44 AM
> To: 'linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org'
> Subject: Re: Running the 823 FADS board @ 72 MHZ
>
> The FADS board are not designed to run at that speed. Just for kicks,
> I've tried seeing how fast I can go without problems. At about 60 MHz
> the SDRAM no longer works, and 68 MHz the DRAM starts not working. This
> is with the default 50 MHz tables. With better tuning, it may be
> possible
> to go higher, but I doubt you could reach 72 MHz with the FADS.
>
> Kirk Haderlie wrote:
> >
> > We are trying to run the FADS board @ 72MHz and enjoying the infamous UPM
> > tables. Has anyone successfully run the FADS board at this speed and if
> so
> > would you be willing to share your UPM tables. We are trying to set them
> > up for the SDRAM and 60-ns EDO DRAM.
> >
> > Kirk Haderlie
> > kirk@vividimage.com
> > Vivid Image Engineering
> >
>
> --
> MPC823 Applications Engineering Development
> Get help from other MPC823 customers on the
> comp.sys.powerpc.tech newsgroup!
>
--
MPC823 Applications Engineering Development
Get help from other MPC823 customers on the
comp.sys.powerpc.tech newsgroup!
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-09 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-09 16:42 Running the 823 FADS board @ 72 MHZ Kirk Haderlie
2000-06-09 18:56 ` Richard Hendricks [this message]
2000-06-09 19:08 ` Steve Rossi
2000-06-09 19:41 ` Richard Hendricks
2000-06-09 19:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-06-09 15:58 Kirk Haderlie
2000-06-09 16:44 ` Richard Hendricks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39413DC8.C2BE7490@motorola.com \
--to=richard.hendricks@motorola.com \
--cc=ffadich@wyle.com \
--cc=khaderlie@vividimage.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.