From: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@amulet.co.jp>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, GNU Parted list <parted@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GNU Parted, linuxppc support coming :-)
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:07:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39626E45.E0496869@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39632512.1953DBAA@amulet.co.jp
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> Andrew Clausen wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to support the Mac partition map, but I'll need some help,
> > since I don't have a PowerPC :-(
>
> Just about everything you need is at
> http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/mac/Devices/Devices-121.html#HEADING121-50
Yeah, I've read it... :-)
> At least, I know that myself and a few other people have been able to
> code based off of that.
Yep.
> > Could someone send me their partition map? You can get this with:
> >
> > # dd if=/dev/hda bs=512 count=MAP-SIZE | gzip | map.gz
> >
> > If you don't know how big your partition map (+1 for driver block) is,
> > then 64 should do (?). (What's a reasonable size for a partition
> > map?)
>
> I forget, but I don't think *anyone* has more than 20 (on most Macs, the
> first 7 contain drivers etc), so 20 x sizeof(partition) (see above URL).
Each partition gets one block (yes?). So thats 20 * 512?
(From comments in various programs, most disks have 512 byte blocks...)
> > Note: I'm not adding HFS support at this stage - it's a LOT of work.
> > So you'll be able to resize ext2 partitions in the near future, but
> > not HFS partitions :-/ Unless there are some volunteers...
>
> There seems to be a shortage of HFS folks these days. :) But ext2
> resizing sounds very cool.
Excuse my ignorance... what FS's do people usually use with MacOS?
HFS/HFS+?
(Is the point "no-one uses MacOS", or "no-one's hacking on HFS
in Linux"?)
> P.S. Can't get you a real map right now, but email me later if you want
> it.
That would be useful, thanks :-)
Andrew Clausen
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-04 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-04 21:44 GNU Parted, linuxppc support coming :-) Andrew Clausen
2000-07-05 12:07 ` Hollis Blanchard
2000-07-04 23:07 ` Andrew Clausen [this message]
2000-07-05 20:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-07-06 5:37 ` Michel Lanners
2000-07-08 5:07 ` Ethan Benson
2000-07-08 8:58 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-07-10 22:19 ` Michel Lanners
2000-07-05 12:26 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-07-04 23:06 ` Andrew Clausen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-05 14:49 Iain Sandoe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39626E45.E0496869@gnu.org \
--to=clausen@gnu.org \
--cc=hollis@amulet.co.jp \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=parted@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.