Re: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360?

[郭劲 <guojin02@tsinghua.org.cn>]

Hi,friends,

   I plug in 2GB DDR-1 in my MPC8360 board,there are two DIMM-184 slots,each
DIMM-184 slot hold 1GB.Could you tell me how to let the linux know about those
2GB?
   In uboot, I set up each DDR CS to visit 512MB, total 4 CS signal. DDR window
range is 2GB. I think the uboot has passed those DDR parameter to linux.
   I once did a test that config the bootargs with mem=512M, then the linux just
only find 512MB, but if I config the mem=2048M, the linux still find about 750MB.
   How to make the linux find the total 2GB memory?
   




>From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>Reply-To: 
>To: vijay baskar <cn.vijaibaskar@gdatech.co.in>
>Subject: Re: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360?
>Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:57:38 -0600
>
>vijay baskar wrote:
>> Hi, "The kernel also allows hardcoded mapping of IO regions into its 
>> virtual address space through the io_block_mapping interface."
>> 
>> Can u tell me how this is in current arch/powerpc.
>
>Everything is explicitly ioremapped.
>
>> Also does it mean that whatever be the size of the ram > 768 MB there
>>  is not going to be much improvement in performance in kernel space 
>> irrespective of invoking CONFIG_HIGHMEM or not?
>
>Well, the kernel can use highmem for cache...  I'm not sure what you
>mean by "in kernel space".
>
>> Also do you think this low mem be enough if i have lots of kernel 
>> space processes each invoking lots of kmallocs.
>
>That depends on what you mean by "lots". :-)
>
>You'll have 768MB of lowmem, and kmallocs can only use lowmem.
>
>> Will there be bottle necks?? Also what alternative do we have if  low
>> mem of 768 MB is not enough??
>
>You'll need to change the user/kernel split, and deal with anything that 
>breaks in the process.
>
>Or get a 64-bit chip. :-)
>
>-Scott
>