From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: diff to tonight's kaffe cvs tree to work on ppc
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:31:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <397DA4CE.D79D06AA@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 397D9E3B.51E31B0E@ivey.uwo.ca
"Kevin B. Hendricks" wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Good to hear from you again!
Hi Kevin!
Good to see you too!
> > This is only true as far as the 64 bit systems running on the 32 bit kernel,
> > which is all there is at the moment.
>
> I am confused. Which of the following is true on a 64 bit system running on a
> 32 bit kernel?
>
> A). sizeof(unsigned int) > sizeof(void *)
>
> or
>
> B). sizeof(unsigned int) < sizeof(void *)
B is true. On the 64 bit kernel int is 32, long is 64, void * is 64.
> If A) is true, then my stack alignment macro will still work. If B) is true, I
> am in trouble.
I wouldn't say you are in trouble. We're going to try to put in 32 bit binary
compatibility so current 32 bit apps should run on the 64 bit kernel without a
recompile. I think there's only potential trouble for someone who would
recompile Kaffe for the 64 bit kernel... but that doesn't exactly quite exist
yet...
> > Work has started on the 64 bit PowerPC Linux kernel, if Kaffe is compiled as a
> > 64 bit app for that kernel then sizeof(unsigned long) = sizeof(void *) will be
> > true. Certainly not a big deal at this stage, but thought you'd be interested
> > none the less.
>
> Sounds good! When IBM is ready to start giving 64bit systems to help
> developers, let me know! ;-)
Actually this sort of thing is starting to happen. While I can't promise
machines, it is possible to get a few out there here and there....
Regards,
Tom
--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-25 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200007250345.VAA22028@faith.cs.utah.edu>
2000-07-25 13:13 ` diff to tonight's kaffe cvs tree to work on ppc Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 13:33 ` tom_gall
2000-07-25 14:03 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 14:31 ` tom_gall [this message]
2000-07-25 17:22 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 18:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-07-25 2:42 Kevin B. Hendricks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=397DA4CE.D79D06AA@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.