From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Phelps Subject: [SNB: Regression] Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915: split irq handling into per-chipset functions Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:51:23 +1000 Message-ID: <3988.1305719483@orpheus.gnusto.com> References: <1304028785-10583-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <1304028785-10583-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from laika.gnusto.com (laika.gnusto.com [207.44.178.75]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F2C9E803 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 04:58:52 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:12:48 MST. <1304028785-10583-3-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Jesse Barnes , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Jesse Barnes writes: > Set the IRQ handling functions in driver load so they'll just be used > directly, rather than branching over most of the code in the chipset > functions. I'm seeing a kernel panic on my SNB i7-2600K with keithp/drm-intel-next (61e499b). I've bisected to 4697995 -- the commit mentioned in the subject. My photo of the stack trace is a bit blurry, but below is my attempted transcription of the the stack. I can't read the addresses at all; please let me know if you'd like me to obtain a better dump. Call Trace: queue_work_op+0x1d/0x30 queue_work+0x35/0x50 ironlake_irq_handler+0xec9/0xfa0 [i915] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x75/0x260 handle_edge_irq+0x6f/0x110 handle_irq+0x1d/0x30 do_IRQ+0x58/0xe9 common_interrupt+0x13/0x13 ... more stuff that I assume is irrelevent ... Please let me know if I can provide additional useful information. Thanks, -Ted