* [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
Andrew,
Here are some writeback bug fixes and code cleanups, based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1.
The detailed description can be found in the first patch, which introduces the
new facility for the following patches to use.
The first two patches combined should fix the "slow writes for concurrent large
and small file writes" bug which Michael Rubin tries to fix.
[PATCH 01/11] writeback: introduce s_more_io_wait for inodes to be re-synced af
[PATCH 02/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on blocked kupdate
[PATCH 03/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on more-pages-to-sync
[PATCH 04/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked inode
[PATCH 05/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on congested blockdev
[PATCH 06/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked buffers
[PATCH 07/11] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode
More code cleanups:
[PATCH 08/11] writeback: introduce queue_dirty()
[PATCH 09/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on memory-backed bdi
[PATCH 10/11] writeback: remove redirty_tail()
[PATCH 11/11] writeback: __sync_single_inode() code cleanup
Diffstat:
fs/fs-writeback.c | 125 +++++++++++++-----------------------
fs/super.c | 1
include/linux/fs.h | 1
include/linux/writeback.h | 1
mm/page-writeback.c | 56 +++++++++-------
5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
Thank you,
Fengguang
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 01/11] writeback: introduce s_more_io_wait for inodes to be re-synced after a while
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7874 bytes --]
Introduce super_block.s_more_io_wait and writeback_control.more_io_wait.
They are for inodes that for some reason cannot be synced immediately.
These inodes will be moved to s_more_io_wait and retried after a while(waiting
up to 0.1s). The normal lots-of-dirty-pages inodes will be moved to more_io
and be synced after other inodes in s_io have been serviced(no sleep).
The new data flow is now simple and fair:
- to fill s_io:
s_more_io +
s_dirty(expired) +
s_more_io_wait
---> s_io
- to drain s_io:
s_io -+--> clean inodes in inode_in_use/inode_unused
|
+--> s_more_io
|
+--> s_more_io_wait
- s_dirty is now a strict FIFO queue
- inode.dirtied_when now really means the first dirty time
- once exipired, the dirty inode will stay in s_*io* queues until made clean
- the dirty inodes in s_*io* queues will be revisted in order: no starvation
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 22 +++++++++++---
fs/super.c | 1
include/linux/fs.h | 1
include/linux/writeback.h | 1
mm/page-writeback.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -170,10 +170,18 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *i
static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
{
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io);
}
+/*
+ * The inode should be retried after _sleeping_ for a while.
+ */
+static void requeue_io_wait(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io_wait);
+}
+
static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
{
/*
* Prevent speculative execution through spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
*/
@@ -204,17 +212,19 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l
static void queue_io(struct super_block *sb,
unsigned long *older_than_this)
{
list_splice_init(&sb->s_more_io, sb->s_io.prev);
move_expired_inodes(&sb->s_dirty, &sb->s_io, older_than_this);
+ list_splice_init(&sb->s_more_io_wait, sb->s_io.prev);
}
int sb_has_dirty_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
{
- return !list_empty(&sb->s_dirty) ||
- !list_empty(&sb->s_io) ||
- !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io);
+ return !list_empty(&sb->s_dirty) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_io) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io_wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_has_dirty_inodes);
/*
* Write a single inode's dirty pages and inode data out to disk.
@@ -470,15 +480,19 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
iput(inode);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
+ wbc->more_io = 1;
break;
+ }
}
if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
wbc->more_io = 1;
+ if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io_wait))
+ wbc->more_io_wait = 1;
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
return ret; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_sync_sb_inodes);
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -541,21 +541,48 @@ void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask
break;
}
}
/*
+ * Write back up to MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES.
+ * Return true if there's no more work.
+ */
+static int writeback_some_pages(struct writeback_control *wbc, int nr)
+{
+ int all_done = 0;
+
+ wbc->more_io = 0;
+ wbc->more_io_wait = 0;
+ wbc->encountered_congestion = 0;
+ wbc->nr_to_write = nr;
+
+ writeback_inodes(wbc);
+
+ if (wbc->encountered_congestion)
+ congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
+
+ if (wbc->more_io)
+ ;
+ else if (wbc->more_io_wait)
+ congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
+ else
+ all_done = 1;
+
+ return all_done;
+}
+
+/*
* writeback at least _min_pages, and keep writing until the amount of dirty
* memory is less than the background threshold, or until we're all clean.
*/
static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages)
{
long min_pages = _min_pages;
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.bdi = NULL,
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
.older_than_this = NULL,
- .nr_to_write = 0,
.nonblocking = 1,
.range_cyclic = 1,
};
for ( ; ; ) {
@@ -565,23 +592,13 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned
get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh, NULL, NULL);
if (global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) < background_thresh
&& min_pages <= 0)
break;
- wbc.more_io = 0;
- wbc.encountered_congestion = 0;
- wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
- wbc.pages_skipped = 0;
- writeback_inodes(&wbc);
+ if (writeback_some_pages(&wbc, MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES))
+ break;
min_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
- if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0 || wbc.pages_skipped > 0) {
- /* Wrote less than expected */
- if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
- congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
- else
- break;
- }
}
}
/*
* Start writeback of `nr_pages' pages. If `nr_pages' is zero, write back
@@ -625,11 +642,10 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg
long nr_to_write;
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.bdi = NULL,
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
.older_than_this = &oldest_jif,
- .nr_to_write = 0,
.nonblocking = 1,
.for_kupdate = 1,
.range_cyclic = 1,
};
@@ -640,20 +656,12 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg
next_jif = start_jif + dirty_writeback_interval;
nr_to_write = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
(inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused);
while (nr_to_write > 0) {
- wbc.more_io = 0;
- wbc.encountered_congestion = 0;
- wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
- writeback_inodes(&wbc);
- if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) {
- if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
- congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
- else
- break; /* All the old data is written */
- }
+ if (writeback_some_pages(&wbc, MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES))
+ break;
nr_to_write -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
}
if (time_before(next_jif, jiffies + HZ))
next_jif = jiffies + HZ;
if (dirty_writeback_interval)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/super.c
@@ -62,10 +62,11 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(s
goto out;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_dirty);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_io);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_more_io);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_more_io_wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_files);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_instances);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&s->s_anon);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_inodes);
init_rwsem(&s->s_umount);
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1009,10 +1009,11 @@ struct super_block {
struct list_head s_inodes; /* all inodes */
struct list_head s_dirty; /* dirty inodes */
struct list_head s_io; /* parked for writeback */
struct list_head s_more_io; /* parked for more writeback */
+ struct list_head s_more_io_wait; /* parked for sleep-then-retry */
struct hlist_head s_anon; /* anonymous dentries for (nfs) exporting */
struct list_head s_files;
struct block_device *s_bdev;
struct mtd_info *s_mtd;
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -61,10 +61,11 @@ struct writeback_control {
unsigned for_kupdate:1; /* A kupdate writeback */
unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */
unsigned for_writepages:1; /* This is a writepages() call */
unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
+ unsigned more_io_wait:1; /* more io to be dispatched after a while */
};
/*
* fs/fs-writeback.c
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 01/11] writeback: introduce s_more_io_wait for inodes to be re-synced after a while
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7874 bytes --]
Introduce super_block.s_more_io_wait and writeback_control.more_io_wait.
They are for inodes that for some reason cannot be synced immediately.
These inodes will be moved to s_more_io_wait and retried after a while(waiting
up to 0.1s). The normal lots-of-dirty-pages inodes will be moved to more_io
and be synced after other inodes in s_io have been serviced(no sleep).
The new data flow is now simple and fair:
- to fill s_io:
s_more_io +
s_dirty(expired) +
s_more_io_wait
---> s_io
- to drain s_io:
s_io -+--> clean inodes in inode_in_use/inode_unused
|
+--> s_more_io
|
+--> s_more_io_wait
- s_dirty is now a strict FIFO queue
- inode.dirtied_when now really means the first dirty time
- once exipired, the dirty inode will stay in s_*io* queues until made clean
- the dirty inodes in s_*io* queues will be revisted in order: no starvation
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 22 +++++++++++---
fs/super.c | 1
include/linux/fs.h | 1
include/linux/writeback.h | 1
mm/page-writeback.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -170,10 +170,18 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *i
static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
{
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io);
}
+/*
+ * The inode should be retried after _sleeping_ for a while.
+ */
+static void requeue_io_wait(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io_wait);
+}
+
static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
{
/*
* Prevent speculative execution through spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
*/
@@ -204,17 +212,19 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l
static void queue_io(struct super_block *sb,
unsigned long *older_than_this)
{
list_splice_init(&sb->s_more_io, sb->s_io.prev);
move_expired_inodes(&sb->s_dirty, &sb->s_io, older_than_this);
+ list_splice_init(&sb->s_more_io_wait, sb->s_io.prev);
}
int sb_has_dirty_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
{
- return !list_empty(&sb->s_dirty) ||
- !list_empty(&sb->s_io) ||
- !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io);
+ return !list_empty(&sb->s_dirty) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_io) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io) ||
+ !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io_wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_has_dirty_inodes);
/*
* Write a single inode's dirty pages and inode data out to disk.
@@ -470,15 +480,19 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
iput(inode);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
+ wbc->more_io = 1;
break;
+ }
}
if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
wbc->more_io = 1;
+ if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io_wait))
+ wbc->more_io_wait = 1;
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
return ret; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_sync_sb_inodes);
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -541,21 +541,48 @@ void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask
break;
}
}
/*
+ * Write back up to MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES.
+ * Return true if there's no more work.
+ */
+static int writeback_some_pages(struct writeback_control *wbc, int nr)
+{
+ int all_done = 0;
+
+ wbc->more_io = 0;
+ wbc->more_io_wait = 0;
+ wbc->encountered_congestion = 0;
+ wbc->nr_to_write = nr;
+
+ writeback_inodes(wbc);
+
+ if (wbc->encountered_congestion)
+ congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
+
+ if (wbc->more_io)
+ ;
+ else if (wbc->more_io_wait)
+ congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
+ else
+ all_done = 1;
+
+ return all_done;
+}
+
+/*
* writeback at least _min_pages, and keep writing until the amount of dirty
* memory is less than the background threshold, or until we're all clean.
*/
static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages)
{
long min_pages = _min_pages;
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.bdi = NULL,
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
.older_than_this = NULL,
- .nr_to_write = 0,
.nonblocking = 1,
.range_cyclic = 1,
};
for ( ; ; ) {
@@ -565,23 +592,13 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned
get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh, NULL, NULL);
if (global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) < background_thresh
&& min_pages <= 0)
break;
- wbc.more_io = 0;
- wbc.encountered_congestion = 0;
- wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
- wbc.pages_skipped = 0;
- writeback_inodes(&wbc);
+ if (writeback_some_pages(&wbc, MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES))
+ break;
min_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
- if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0 || wbc.pages_skipped > 0) {
- /* Wrote less than expected */
- if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
- congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
- else
- break;
- }
}
}
/*
* Start writeback of `nr_pages' pages. If `nr_pages' is zero, write back
@@ -625,11 +642,10 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg
long nr_to_write;
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.bdi = NULL,
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
.older_than_this = &oldest_jif,
- .nr_to_write = 0,
.nonblocking = 1,
.for_kupdate = 1,
.range_cyclic = 1,
};
@@ -640,20 +656,12 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg
next_jif = start_jif + dirty_writeback_interval;
nr_to_write = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
(inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused);
while (nr_to_write > 0) {
- wbc.more_io = 0;
- wbc.encountered_congestion = 0;
- wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
- writeback_inodes(&wbc);
- if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) {
- if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
- congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
- else
- break; /* All the old data is written */
- }
+ if (writeback_some_pages(&wbc, MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES))
+ break;
nr_to_write -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
}
if (time_before(next_jif, jiffies + HZ))
next_jif = jiffies + HZ;
if (dirty_writeback_interval)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/super.c
@@ -62,10 +62,11 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(s
goto out;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_dirty);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_io);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_more_io);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_more_io_wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_files);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_instances);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&s->s_anon);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_inodes);
init_rwsem(&s->s_umount);
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1009,10 +1009,11 @@ struct super_block {
struct list_head s_inodes; /* all inodes */
struct list_head s_dirty; /* dirty inodes */
struct list_head s_io; /* parked for writeback */
struct list_head s_more_io; /* parked for more writeback */
+ struct list_head s_more_io_wait; /* parked for sleep-then-retry */
struct hlist_head s_anon; /* anonymous dentries for (nfs) exporting */
struct list_head s_files;
struct block_device *s_bdev;
struct mtd_info *s_mtd;
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -61,10 +61,11 @@ struct writeback_control {
unsigned for_kupdate:1; /* A kupdate writeback */
unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */
unsigned for_writepages:1; /* This is a writepages() call */
unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
+ unsigned more_io_wait:1; /* more io to be dispatched after a while */
};
/*
* fs/fs-writeback.c
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on blocked kupdate
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
kupdate cannot write all pages because of uncontrollable bad conditions.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -292,11 +292,16 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
* For the kupdate function we move the inode
* to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
* soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
*/
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- requeue_io(inode);
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
+ /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
+ else
+ /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else {
/*
* Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
* other inodes on this superblock will get some
* writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on blocked kupdate
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
kupdate cannot write all pages because of uncontrollable bad conditions.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -292,11 +292,16 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
* For the kupdate function we move the inode
* to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
* soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
*/
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- requeue_io(inode);
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
+ /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
+ else
+ /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else {
/*
* Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
* other inodes on this superblock will get some
* writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on more-pages-to-sync
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-simplify-more-io.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2419 bytes --]
Replace redirty_tail() with requeue_io()/requeue_io_wait() when
there are more pages to sync. There won't be starvation.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 43 ++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -273,46 +273,19 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
- * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
- * the inode; Move it from s_io onto s_more_io/s_dirty.
+ * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
- /*
- * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
- * this inode at the head of s_dirty so it gets first
- * consideration. Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
- * the reasons described there. I'm not really sure
- * how much sense this makes. Presumably I had a good
- * reasons for doing it this way, and I'd rather not
- * muck with it at present.
- */
- if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
- /*
- * For the kupdate function we move the inode
- * to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
- * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
- /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
- requeue_io_wait(inode);
- else
- /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
- requeue_io(inode);
- } else {
- /*
- * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
- * other inodes on this superblock will get some
- * writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
- * file would indefinitely suspend writeout of
- * all the other files.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- redirty_tail(inode);
- }
+ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
+ /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
+ else
+ /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
* Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
* the pages.
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 03/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on more-pages-to-sync
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-simplify-more-io.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2419 bytes --]
Replace redirty_tail() with requeue_io()/requeue_io_wait() when
there are more pages to sync. There won't be starvation.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 43 ++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -273,46 +273,19 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
- * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
- * the inode; Move it from s_io onto s_more_io/s_dirty.
+ * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
- /*
- * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
- * this inode at the head of s_dirty so it gets first
- * consideration. Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
- * the reasons described there. I'm not really sure
- * how much sense this makes. Presumably I had a good
- * reasons for doing it this way, and I'd rather not
- * muck with it at present.
- */
- if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
- /*
- * For the kupdate function we move the inode
- * to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
- * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
- /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
- requeue_io_wait(inode);
- else
- /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
- requeue_io(inode);
- } else {
- /*
- * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
- * other inodes on this superblock will get some
- * writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
- * file would indefinitely suspend writeout of
- * all the other files.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- redirty_tail(inode);
- }
+ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
+ /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
+ else
+ /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
* Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
* the pages.
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked inode
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1050 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
inode is locked
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -322,16 +322,13 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *i
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
/*
* We're skipping this inode because it's locked, and we're not
- * doing writeback-for-data-integrity. Move it to s_more_io so
- * that writeback can proceed with the other inodes on s_io.
- * We'll have another go at writing back this inode when we
- * completed a full scan of s_io.
+ * doing writeback-for-data-integrity. Recheck it after a while.
*/
- requeue_io(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
return 0;
}
/*
* It's a data-integrity sync. We must wait.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked inode
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1050 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
inode is locked
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -322,16 +322,13 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *i
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
/*
* We're skipping this inode because it's locked, and we're not
- * doing writeback-for-data-integrity. Move it to s_more_io so
- * that writeback can proceed with the other inodes on s_io.
- * We'll have another go at writing back this inode when we
- * completed a full scan of s_io.
+ * doing writeback-for-data-integrity. Recheck it after a while.
*/
- requeue_io(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
return 0;
}
/*
* It's a data-integrity sync. We must wait.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on congested blockdev
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
congested blockdev
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
break; /* Skip a congested fs */
- requeue_io(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
continue; /* Skip a congested blockdev */
}
if (wbc->bdi && bdi != wbc->bdi) {
if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on congested blockdev
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
congested blockdev
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
break; /* Skip a congested fs */
- requeue_io(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
continue; /* Skip a congested blockdev */
}
if (wbc->bdi && bdi != wbc->bdi) {
if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked buffers
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-d.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
pages skipped due to locked buffers
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -449,11 +449,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
if (wbc->pages_skipped != pages_skipped) {
/*
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
* buffers. Skip this inode for now.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
iput(inode);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked buffers
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-d.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
Convert to requeue_io_wait() for case:
pages skipped due to locked buffers
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -449,11 +449,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
if (wbc->pages_skipped != pages_skipped) {
/*
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
* buffers. Skip this inode for now.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
iput(inode);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/11] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty-b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
Redirtied inodes could be seen in really fast writes.
They should really be synced as soon as possible.
redirty_tail() could delay the inode for up to 30s.
Kill the delay by using requeue_io() instead.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -287,11 +287,11 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
* Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
* the pages.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
/*
* The inode is clean, inuse
*/
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/11] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty-b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
Redirtied inodes could be seen in really fast writes.
They should really be synced as soon as possible.
redirty_tail() could delay the inode for up to 30s.
Kill the delay by using requeue_io() instead.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -287,11 +287,11 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
* Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
* the pages.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
/*
* The inode is clean, inuse
*/
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 08/11] writeback: introduce queue_dirty()
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-queue_dirty.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1876 bytes --]
Introduce queue_dirty() to enqueue a newly dirtied inode.
It helps remove duplicate code.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -23,10 +23,19 @@
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
#include "internal.h"
+/*
+ * Enqueue a newly dirtied inode.
+ */
+static void queue_dirty(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
+ list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_dirty);
+}
+
/**
* __mark_inode_dirty - internal function
* @inode: inode to mark
* @flags: what kind of dirty (i.e. I_DIRTY_SYNC)
* Mark an inode as dirty. Callers should use mark_inode_dirty or
@@ -120,14 +129,12 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *in
/*
* If the inode was already on s_dirty/s_io/s_more_io, don't
* reposition it (that would break s_dirty time-ordering).
*/
- if (!was_dirty) {
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
- }
+ if (!was_dirty)
+ queue_dirty(inode);
}
out:
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
}
@@ -438,14 +445,12 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
__iget(inode);
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
err = __writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
if (!ret)
ret = err;
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_HOLD) {
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
- }
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_HOLD)
+ queue_dirty(inode);
if (current_is_pdflush())
writeback_release(bdi);
if (wbc->pages_skipped != pages_skipped) {
/*
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/11] writeback: introduce queue_dirty()
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-queue_dirty.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1876 bytes --]
Introduce queue_dirty() to enqueue a newly dirtied inode.
It helps remove duplicate code.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -23,10 +23,19 @@
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
#include "internal.h"
+/*
+ * Enqueue a newly dirtied inode.
+ */
+static void queue_dirty(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
+ list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_dirty);
+}
+
/**
* __mark_inode_dirty - internal function
* @inode: inode to mark
* @flags: what kind of dirty (i.e. I_DIRTY_SYNC)
* Mark an inode as dirty. Callers should use mark_inode_dirty or
@@ -120,14 +129,12 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *in
/*
* If the inode was already on s_dirty/s_io/s_more_io, don't
* reposition it (that would break s_dirty time-ordering).
*/
- if (!was_dirty) {
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
- }
+ if (!was_dirty)
+ queue_dirty(inode);
}
out:
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
}
@@ -438,14 +445,12 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
__iget(inode);
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
err = __writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
if (!ret)
ret = err;
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_HOLD) {
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
- }
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_HOLD)
+ queue_dirty(inode);
if (current_is_pdflush())
writeback_release(bdi);
if (wbc->pages_skipped != pages_skipped) {
/*
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on memory-backed bdi
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty-a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
Replace redirty_tail() with queue_dirty() on memory backed bdi.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -400,11 +400,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
long pages_skipped;
int err;
if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) {
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ queue_dirty(inode);
if (sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb)) {
/*
* Dirty memory-backed blockdev: the ramdisk
* driver does this. Skip just this inode
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on memory-backed bdi
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty-a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
Replace redirty_tail() with queue_dirty() on memory backed bdi.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -400,11 +400,11 @@ int generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
long pages_skipped;
int err;
if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) {
- redirty_tail(inode);
+ queue_dirty(inode);
if (sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb)) {
/*
* Dirty memory-backed blockdev: the ramdisk
* driver does this. Skip just this inode
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/11] writeback: remove redirty_tail()
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty_tail.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1490 bytes --]
Remove redirty_tail(). It's no longer used.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 24 ------------------------
1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -146,34 +146,10 @@ static int write_inode(struct inode *ino
return inode->i_sb->s_op->write_inode(inode, sync);
return 0;
}
/*
- * Redirty an inode: set its when-it-was dirtied timestamp and move it to the
- * furthest end of its superblock's dirty-inode list.
- *
- * Before stamping the inode's ->dirtied_when, we check to see whether it is
- * already the most-recently-dirtied inode on the s_dirty list. If that is
- * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
- * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
- */
-static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode)
-{
- struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
-
- if (!list_empty(&sb->s_dirty)) {
- struct inode *tail_inode;
-
- tail_inode = list_entry(sb->s_dirty.next, struct inode, i_list);
- if (!time_after_eq(inode->dirtied_when,
- tail_inode->dirtied_when))
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- }
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
-}
-
-/*
* requeue inode for re-scanning after sb->s_io list is exhausted.
*/
static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
{
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/11] writeback: remove redirty_tail()
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-remove-redirty_tail.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1490 bytes --]
Remove redirty_tail(). It's no longer used.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 24 ------------------------
1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -146,34 +146,10 @@ static int write_inode(struct inode *ino
return inode->i_sb->s_op->write_inode(inode, sync);
return 0;
}
/*
- * Redirty an inode: set its when-it-was dirtied timestamp and move it to the
- * furthest end of its superblock's dirty-inode list.
- *
- * Before stamping the inode's ->dirtied_when, we check to see whether it is
- * already the most-recently-dirtied inode on the s_dirty list. If that is
- * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
- * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
- */
-static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode)
-{
- struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
-
- if (!list_empty(&sb->s_dirty)) {
- struct inode *tail_inode;
-
- tail_inode = list_entry(sb->s_dirty.next, struct inode, i_list);
- if (!time_after_eq(inode->dirtied_when,
- tail_inode->dirtied_when))
- inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- }
- list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
-}
-
-/*
* requeue inode for re-scanning after sb->s_io list is exhausted.
*/
static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
{
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/11] writeback: __sync_single_inode() code cleanup
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-simplify-x.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1654 bytes --]
Make the if-else straight in __sync_single_inode().
No behavior change.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -248,37 +248,36 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
if (wait) {
int err = filemap_fdatawait(mapping);
if (ret == 0)
ret = err;
}
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
- if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
- mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
+ if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
+ /*
+ * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
+ * the pages.
+ */
+ requeue_io(inode);
+ } else if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
* sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
/* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
requeue_io_wait(inode);
else
/* slice used up: queue for next turn */
requeue_io(inode);
- } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
- /*
- * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
- * the pages.
- */
- requeue_io(inode);
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
/*
* The inode is clean, inuse
*/
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
} else {
/*
* The inode is clean, unused
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 11/11] writeback: __sync_single_inode() code cleanup
@ 2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-12-28 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Michael Rubin, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-simplify-x.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1654 bytes --]
Make the if-else straight in __sync_single_inode().
No behavior change.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -248,37 +248,36 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
if (wait) {
int err = filemap_fdatawait(mapping);
if (ret == 0)
ret = err;
}
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
- if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
- mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
+ if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
+ /*
+ * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
+ * the pages.
+ */
+ requeue_io(inode);
+ } else if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
* sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
/* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
requeue_io_wait(inode);
else
/* slice used up: queue for next turn */
requeue_io(inode);
- } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
- /*
- * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
- * the pages.
- */
- requeue_io(inode);
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
/*
* The inode is clean, inuse
*/
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
} else {
/*
* The inode is clean, unused
*/
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread