From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on more-pages-to-sync
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:41:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <398849894.92868@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20071228135122.055004293@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071228134119.112899193@mail.ustc.edu.cn
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-simplify-more-io.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2419 bytes --]
Replace redirty_tail() with requeue_io()/requeue_io_wait() when
there are more pages to sync. There won't be starvation.
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 43 ++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -273,46 +273,19 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
- * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
- * the inode; Move it from s_io onto s_more_io/s_dirty.
+ * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
*/
- /*
- * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
- * this inode at the head of s_dirty so it gets first
- * consideration. Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
- * the reasons described there. I'm not really sure
- * how much sense this makes. Presumably I had a good
- * reasons for doing it this way, and I'd rather not
- * muck with it at present.
- */
- if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
- /*
- * For the kupdate function we move the inode
- * to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
- * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
- /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
- requeue_io_wait(inode);
- else
- /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
- requeue_io(inode);
- } else {
- /*
- * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
- * other inodes on this superblock will get some
- * writeout. Otherwise heavy writing to one
- * file would indefinitely suspend writeout of
- * all the other files.
- */
- inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
- redirty_tail(inode);
- }
+ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > 0)
+ /* somehow blocked: wait and retry */
+ requeue_io_wait(inode);
+ else
+ /* slice used up: queue for next turn */
+ requeue_io(inode);
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
* Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
* the pages.
*/
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-28 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 13:41 [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: introduce s_more_io_wait for inodes to be re-synced after a while Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on blocked kupdate Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on more-pages-to-sync Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked inode Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on congested blockdev Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on locked buffers Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: introduce queue_dirty() Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: replace redirty_tail() on memory-backed bdi Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: remove redirty_tail() Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: __sync_single_inode() code cleanup Fengguang Wu
2007-12-28 13:41 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=398849894.92868@ustc.edu.cn \
--to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.