From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTjUO-0003WH-IZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:22:32 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 18:08:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,690,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="163137591" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.137]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 18:08:52 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Morgan Little Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:08:51 +0000 Message-ID: <3989989.S5U52SNN0R@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1351009220-30119-4-git-send-email-morgan.little@windriver.com> References: <1351009220-30119-1-git-send-email-morgan.little@windriver.com> <1351009220-30119-4-git-send-email-morgan.little@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 3/3] ntp: Clean up recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:22:32 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 23 October 2012 12:20:20 Morgan Little wrote: > -PACKAGES += "ntpdate ${PN}-bin ${PN}-tickadj ${PN}-utils" ... > +PACKAGES += "${PN}-date ${PN}-bin ${PN}-tickadj ${PN}-utils" I'm not particularly happy with this change. Apart from the fact that it wasn't mentioned in the commit message, it breaks any recipe that depends upon the previous ntpdate package. Could we go back to the old ntpdate name for the package or at the very least provide an RPROVIDES for the old name? I'm happy to submit a patch to do this once there is agreement either way. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre