All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Redelings I <bredelin@ucla.edu>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Happiness with t8-vmpatch4 (was Re:  Does page-aging really work?)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 00:09:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39C31C9F.1C202CD8@ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009081937020.1206-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva

Hi guys - 
	I have done a few small tests on t8-vmpatch4 (64Mb RAM, 166Mhz UP
PPro), and I must say that I am very happy with the results.  More
comparison with test8 vanilla confirms that Rik's version is much more
responsive, also that Rik is (or course) correct - unused process are
indeed swapped out, but shared pages from (I assume) libc remain.

	Observations:
   1. test8-vmpatch4 does not swap very much at first, but then swaps a
lot of memory in a short time when triggered.
	Specifically, I untarred a kernel source tree and saw NO swapping . 
The working set was NOT evicted :)  I then started more programs, and
saw that the cache shrunk a lot: still no swapping.  Then I ran the
untar again, and the kernel swapped out 22Mb very quickly.  However, I
must say that it was still very smooth - I didn't even notice the
swapping until I looked at xosview; normally it is quite audible.  Also,
the choice of pages for swapping out seemed to be VERY accurate - there
was virtually no page-in as long as I was watching...

  2. I guess we could wish that unused programs got swapped a bit sooner
instead of all at once - but presumably that can be tuned.

	Congrats on the great code!  Tuning does indeed seem to be fixing the
problems that I saw before.

thanks again,
-BenRI
-- 
"I want to be in the light, as He is in the Light,
 I want to shine like the stars in the heavens." - DC Talk, "In the
Light"
Benjamin Redelings I      <><     http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~bredelin/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-09-16  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-09-08 21:34 Multiqueue VM Patch OK? Does page-aging really work? Benjamin Redelings I
2000-09-08 22:58 ` Rik van Riel
2000-09-16  7:09   ` Benjamin Redelings I [this message]
2000-09-16  7:57     ` Happiness with t8-vmpatch4 (was Re: Does page-aging really work?) Rik van Riel
2000-09-16 18:20       ` Benjamin Redelings I
2000-09-16 18:22         ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39C31C9F.1C202CD8@ucla.edu \
    --to=bredelin@ucla.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.