From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <39C80065.4741C043@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:10:13 -0400 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: paulus@linuxcare.com.au, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/PPC Development Subject: Re: __ioremap_at() in 2.4.0-test9-pre2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Roman Zippel wrote: > Fixed addresses shouldn't be that much of a problem. They are no problem today....It would be nice if it stayed that way :-). > .... we would only need a C implementation from parts hashtable.S, > what might be usefull for other stuff as well. Except only the 7xx (601?, 604) use the hastable. It's not a generic MMU place. > Something I would like to throw out first is mem_pieces.c.... > ... pmac_find_end_of_memory(), which then is completly confused, I am usually confused by this point, too :-). I then just tip-toe away thinking there are better places I can spend my time. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/