From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Is LVM dead ?
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 01:08:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39F0B45C.6735D447@tls.msk.ru> (raw)
I see very strange situation with lvm now.
And it is really strange for me.
Ok, I signed petition, there are far too many efforts to include
lvm into kernel. And it was included. And that was the last news
item at lvm website! There are too many bugs in lvmtools, many of
them already found/reported. There are far too many headaches to
build lvm with new kernels. There are too many patches floating
around. And the latest file date is about march-2000... It seemed
to be that folks has have only one target -- to include lvm into
kernel. To set up a dots under i's. And that was a final plan.
Again, when IBM comes with their ideas (not to say here good or
bad -- it is a different story), people here just said something
like "we already have all that we want, so go out"... (discussion
was long and interesting, but primary authors was not involved
there).
What's happening? I'm really worried, as this is a very
useful thing. And I call here -- should someone become a
new maintainer of the whole thing ? :((( As current
maintainer as it seemed to be just did all that he want
already...
I'm sorry, I'm really very sorry for this all if I'm wrong.
This is just my impression, nothing more. And I apologize,
really, if I'm wrong.
But -- who can demonstrate that I'm wrong ??? :(((((((((
Regards,
Michael.
next reply other threads:[~2000-10-20 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-20 21:08 Michael Tokarev [this message]
2000-10-21 3:03 ` [linux-lvm] Is LVM dead ? Heinz Mauelshagen
2000-10-21 3:49 ` Andi Kleen
2000-10-21 9:19 ` Paul Jakma
2000-10-21 9:21 ` Jan Niehusmann
2000-10-23 23:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2000-10-21 22:31 ` Michael Ju. Tokarev
2000-10-25 1:48 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39F0B45C.6735D447@tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.