From: Petko Manolov <petkan@dce.bg>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: changed section attributes
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:29:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39FED73C.A4BA630D@dce.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16848.973001732@ocs3.ocs-net>
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> >Changing the declaration in linux/module.h to ".modinfo,"a""
> >fixed the problem, but i noticed that the author said that
> >"we want .modinfo to not be allocated"
>
> Historically that was the only way of preventing the .modinfo section
> from being included in modules when they were loaded into the kernel.
> An alternative is to allow .modinfo to be allocated and have modutils
> treat it as non-allocated. This feature was added to modutils 2.3.19
> on October 22 (bleeding edge toolchains for IA64 are "fun") so anybody
> who is annoyed by the warning messages can apply this patch.
[snip]
> -/* The attributes of a section are set the first time the section is
> - seen; we want .modinfo to not be allocated. */
> -
> -__asm__(".section .modinfo\n\t.previous");
> -
> /* Define the module variable, and usage macros. */
> extern struct module __this_module;
This is exactly what i did (excluding removing of the comment ;-)
I wonder why the compiler decides to add ".section
.modinfo,"a",@progbits"
May be this is the thing which should be fixed.
Petkan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010300344130.6792-100000@web.sajt.cz>
2000-10-29 20:08 ` [patch] NE2000 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-29 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2000-10-30 10:57 ` Jorge Nerin
2000-10-31 13:54 ` changed section attributes Petko Manolov
2000-10-31 14:15 ` Keith Owens
2000-10-31 14:29 ` Petko Manolov [this message]
2000-10-31 14:34 ` Keith Owens
2000-10-31 14:41 ` Petko Manolov
[not found] ` <39FFE612.2688A5AD@yahoo.com>
2000-11-03 17:45 ` [patch] NE2000 Jorge Nerin
2000-11-04 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-06 11:34 ` Jorge Nerin
2000-11-06 18:40 ` kuznet
2000-11-06 18:46 ` kuznet
2000-11-06 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-08 16:45 ` kuznet
2000-11-07 2:40 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-08 20:31 ` kuznet
2000-11-09 1:18 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-09 1:27 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <3A0A8236.2166E00@uow.edu.au>
2000-11-09 11:20 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-10 1:45 ` Tom Leete
2000-11-09 18:03 ` kuznet
2000-11-09 18:01 ` Steve Whitehouse
2000-11-06 7:06 ` ping -f kills ne2k (was:[patch] NE2000) Paul Gortmaker
2000-11-06 20:08 ` Jorge Nerin
2000-11-09 15:11 ` Jorge Nerin
2000-10-30 9:17 ` [patch] NE2000 Paul Gortmaker
2000-10-30 14:58 ` pavel rabel
2000-10-30 19:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-01 5:31 ` Paul Gortmaker
2000-11-01 8:23 ` Donald Becker
2000-11-01 13:27 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39FED73C.A4BA630D@dce.bg \
--to=petkan@dce.bg \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.