From: Jordan Mendelson <jordy@napster.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:32:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A07B01A.1E70EE20@napster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A07662F.39D711AE@napster.com> <200011070428.UAA01710@pizda.ninka.net> <3A079127.47B2B14C@napster.com> <200011070533.VAA02179@pizda.ninka.net> <3A079D83.2B46A8FD@napster.com> <200011070603.WAA02292@pizda.ninka.net> <3A07A4B0.A7E9D62@napster.com> <200011070656.WAA02435@pizda.ninka.net> <3A07AC45.DCC961FF@napster.com> <200011070712.XAA02511@pizda.ninka.net>
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:16:21 -0800
> From: Jordan Mendelson <jordy@napster.com>
>
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
> > It is clear though, that something is messing with or corrupting the
> > packets. One thing you might try is turning off TCP header
> > compression for the PPP link, does this make a difference?
>
> Actually, there has been several reports that turning header
> compression does help.
>
> If this is what is causing the TCP sequence numbers to change
> then either Win98's or Earthlink terminal server's implementation
> of TCP header compression is buggy.
>
> Assuming this is true, it explains why Win98's TCP does not "see" the
> data sent by Linux, because such a bug would make the TCP checksum of
> these packets incorrect and thus dropped by Win98's TCP.
Ok, but why doesn't 2.2.16 exhibit this behavior?
We've had reports from quite a number of people complaining about this
and I'm fairly certain not all of them are from Earthlink.
Jordan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-07 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-07 2:17 Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 5:20 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 5:33 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 6:13 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 6:03 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 6:44 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 6:56 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 7:16 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 7:12 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 7:32 ` Jordan Mendelson [this message]
2000-11-07 7:27 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 9:41 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-07 9:57 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 12:22 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-07 12:10 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 9:42 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-07 18:13 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 9:38 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-07 9:58 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 10:36 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-07 22:43 ` Lincoln Dale
2000-11-07 7:03 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-07 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 7:16 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-07 7:14 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-07 9:35 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-07 10:00 ` David S. Miller
[not found] <3A076701.F437F88B@napster.com>
2000-11-07 3:44 ` Jordan Mendelson
2000-11-07 4:29 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A07B01A.1E70EE20@napster.com \
--to=jordy@napster.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.