From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:44:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A16CE07.37A9F4B6@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200011181750.SAA14559@cave.bitwizard.nl>
Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > >
> > > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and
> > > > > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks
> > > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS?
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)
> > > >
> > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported
> > > > MODULE_foo - export specific symbol
> > > >
> > > > none of the above, export all globals but without modvers
> > > ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!!
> > >
> > > I consider that a bug, but...
> >
> > eh? Can you give an example of this? This should definitely -not- be
> > the case.
>
> Compile a kernel, marking "sx" and "riscom8" as modules.
>
> Install, modprobe sx, and voila, you'll pull in the riscom because
> its "block_til_ready" static was found to satisfy the block_til_ready
> from generic_serial.
That doesn't imply that statics are being exported as symbols.
generic_serial had no EXPORT_xxx markers, and block_til_ready was
public, so it was expected behavior for g_s to export b_t_r as a symbol.
It is strange that a static which exists in riscom8 causes another
module which exports the same symbol to be pulled in.
> We're working on renaming the one in generic_serial to
> "gs_block_til_ready", but haven't checked yet if the patch got
> applied. So you may have to use a "month-old" kernel for this test.
Can this function be made static? It looks like many drivers define it
themselves..
In any case, you have a patch coming to you [offline] cleaning up the sx
and riscom8 namespaces...
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-18 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-18 5:15 EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? Jeff Garzik
2000-11-18 7:40 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-18 17:12 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-18 17:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-18 17:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-18 17:50 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-18 18:44 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2000-11-19 8:12 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A16CE07.37A9F4B6@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.