Re: neighbour table?

[David Ford <david@linux.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]

"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:

> > Be sure lo is established before eth0 and you won't see this message.
>
> Hmm.  How does the interaction work.  I've been meaning to track it for
> a while but haven't yet.
>
> >From the cases I have observed it seems to be connected with arp requests
> that aren't answered. (I.e when something is misconfigured and you try to nfsroot off
> of the wrong ip on your subnet)
> And I keep thinking neighbour table underflow would have been a better message.

I'm not sure, I'm repeating what Alexey (iirc) has said in the past.  I've been
there/done that and sure enough making sure 'lo' is brought up first prevents that
message.  As to the NFS, no idea, I've never messed w/ nfsroot.

-d


[-- Attachment #2: Card for David Ford --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 176 bytes --]

begin:vcard 
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;14688
fn:David Ford
end:vcard