From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ulf@twc.de>
Message-ID: <3A3477D0.94BC1D88@twc.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:44:32 +0100
From: Ulf Bartelt <ulf@twc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Linux 2.4.0-test12-pre7 LVM .9 vs .8final
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0012081042590.14388-100000@mail.mnsu.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

Ricardo Muggli wrote:
>=20
> I have noticed that Linux 2.4.0-test12-pre7 still comes with .8final. Is
> there a plan to have .9 incorporated at some future time into the stock
> 2.4 kernels? Will this happen before 2.4 comes out?
>=20
> Also is there a transition path between .8final and .9? (short of save
> everything to tape and restore?)

I was wondering =EF=BF=BDbout the same question yesterday...

A set of lvm tools for multiple versions of the io protocol could help a
lot...

Sure this can be faked using links, wrappers etc...