From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:40:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A3AB9FD.B58049C4@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200012141308.eBED8Oh06198@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
>
> Rogier Wolff writes:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > What better interactivity ;)
> > Thus to me, 2.4 FEELS much less interactive. When I move windows they
> > don't follow the mouse in real-time.
>
> Interesting observation: in a scrolling rxvt, kernel 2.0 is smoother than
> 2.2, which is smoother than 2.4. I hope this trend isn't going to
> continue to 2.6. ;(
Could this be due to the shorter times caculated by the scheduler
recaculate code with the change that moved "nice" into the task_struct?
George
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-16 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-10 20:36 UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12 Steven Cole
2000-12-11 18:16 ` John Fremlin
2000-12-11 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-11 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-11 19:50 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2000-12-11 20:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2000-12-11 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-11 22:03 ` Gerhard Mack
2000-12-11 22:06 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-13 9:44 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-12-14 13:08 ` Russell King
2000-12-16 0:40 ` george anzinger [this message]
2000-12-12 14:49 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 18:18 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 20:19 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 22:09 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-11 22:12 ` Gabor Lenart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-10 15:31 Steven Cole
2000-12-10 19:52 ` Aaron Tiensivu
2000-12-11 23:02 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-12 5:17 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-12 11:01 ` Helge Hafting
2000-12-12 10:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-12 14:15 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A3AB9FD.B58049C4@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.