From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:53:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:53:18 -0500 Received: from isis.its.uow.edu.au ([130.130.68.21]:13787 "EHLO isis.its.uow.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:53:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3A54739F.FB8D6F3D@uow.edu.au> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 23:59:11 +1100 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test8 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Loth CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado In-Reply-To: <20010104123139.A15097@gidayu.max.uni-duisburg.de> <3A546F8E.ABF952F@uow.edu.au>, <3A546F8E.ABF952F@uow.edu.au>; from andrewm@uow.edu.au on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:41:50PM +1100 <20010104134315.C15097@gidayu.max.uni-duisburg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Loth wrote: > > > > > Did _both_ 3c90x and 3c59x fail, or only 3c59x? > > > > Both did not work. And 3c59x from 2.2.18 didn't work > as well, and as far as I could judge 3c90x is not included > in the kernel proper, right? Now that is wierd. They're radically different drivers, and the 3com one doesn't seem to undergo many changes at all. I wonder if the PCI scan order may have changed. What other PCI devices did you have in that machine? Any other NICs? - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/