From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3A70E993.54149F46@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:05:55 -0800 From: Frank Rowand Reply-To: frowand@mvista.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Edelsohn CC: Gabriel Paubert , Dan Malek , Roman Zippel , mgreer@mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHMEM on PPC References: <200101252239.RAA04412@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>>>> Gabriel Paubert writes: > > Gabriel> BATS are a good idea, but variable page size are another, superior IMHO, > Gabriel> possibility. It seems to be what Power4 has from what David said a few > Gabriel> days ago. I don't know how they mix variable page size with hash tables > Gabriel> and failed to find any detailed documentation... > > The variable page sizes are determined on a segment by segment > basis. The segment type determines how to interpret the page table -- > whether it maps 4KB or 16MB. The 405 processors have page sizes of 1k 4k 16k 64k 256k 1m 4m 16m The 440 processors are the same except 4m removed 256m added The page size is determined by a field in the TLB entry. -Frank -- Frank Rowand MontaVista Software, Inc ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/