From: Adam Schrotenboer <ajschrotenboer@lycosmail.com>
To: "Dunlap, Randy" <randy.dunlap@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:57:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A78D0A1.9070100@lycosmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5E932F578EBD111AC3F00A0C96B1E6F07DBDFC7@orsmsx31.jf.intel.com>
Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:ajschrotenboer@lycosmail.com]
>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66
>>>>>
>>>> 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Tue Jan 30
>>>
>> 15:35:21 EST 2001
>>
>>>>>> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>>>>>> BIOS-88: 000000000009f000 @ 0000000000000000 (usable)
>>>>>> BIOS-88: 0000000003ff0000 @ 0000000000100000 (usable)
>>>>>> On node 0 totalpages: 16624
>>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> Linux version 2.4.0 (root@tabriel) (gcc version
>>>
>> pgcc-2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #2 Mon Jan 8 09:02:27 EST 2001
>>
>>>> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>>>> BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 @ 0000000000000000 (usable)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 0000000000000400 @ 000000000009fc00 (reserved)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 0000000000010000 @ 00000000000f0000 (reserved)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 0000000000010000 @ 00000000ffff0000 (reserved)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 000000000bef0000 @ 0000000000100000 (usable)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 000000000000d000 @ 000000000bff3000 (ACPI data)
>>>> BIOS-e820: 0000000000003000 @ 000000000bff0000 (ACPI NVS)
>>>> On node 0 totalpages: 49136
>>>
>> It did it again. fresh tree, egcs 1.1.2, etc
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Different versions of gcc were used on 2.4.0 vs. 2.4.1.
> Were different versions of as also used? (hint?)
>
> Or somehow in linux/arch/i386/boot/setup.S, your source
> file has
> #define STANDARD_MEMORY_BIOS_CALL
> ?
>
> ~Randy / 503-677-5408
>
granted, it is possible that a different gas was used, but extremely
unlikely. I have been known to build my own compilers (need to try libc
some time), but haven't played around w/ binutils. box is Redhat 6.[01]?
upped to Mandrake 7.1 a month ago.
haven't installed any new compilers lately, I think that 2.4.1 makefile
is different, selects diff compiler (haven't found out the differences
btwn Mandrake and RedHat yet)
grepped sources for that #define; did not find anywhere
Sorry for bad grammar, usually not this bad, very very tired, can't make
fingers type straight half the time.
currently running 2.4.1 rebuilt with mem=192M. Hope this is resolved soon.
Also will consider trying to specify compiler to be same as 2.4.0 build
(not likely a good idea, given that pgcc 2.95.x borks 2.4.1
[fxsr_alignment IIRC])
Also will look for different as executables. BTW, pgcc above is actually
2.95.3, not 2.95.2
I'm rambling and need sleep.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-01 2:22 [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB Dunlap, Randy
2001-02-01 2:47 ` 2.4.1 FireWire compile problem Dax Kelson
2001-02-01 2:54 ` Dax Kelson
2001-02-01 2:57 ` Adam Schrotenboer [this message]
2001-02-06 0:05 ` [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB Ricky Beam
2001-02-06 1:53 ` Ricky Beam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-31 23:19 Mikael Pettersson
2001-02-01 0:23 ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-01-31 10:57 Mikael Pettersson
2001-01-31 11:18 ` Dr. David Gilbert
2001-01-31 16:05 ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-01-31 4:25 Adam Schrotenboer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A78D0A1.9070100@lycosmail.com \
--to=ajschrotenboer@lycosmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.