All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
To: Mark Spencer <markster@linux-support.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@lambdatel.com
Subject: Re: Linux interrupt latency
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 01:32:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A800B14.53490EA3@uow.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102052304170.13906-100000@hoochie.linux-support.net>

Mark Spencer wrote:
> 
> Can anyone suggest what might be causing the problem on non-Intel
> chipsets, particularly what event might be occuring once per second and
> disabling interrupts for a couple of hundred microseconds?  Thanks!

I have a gizmo which will find this for you.

http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/#timepegs

- Grab the 2.4.1-pre10 patch and tpt.
- Apply patch.  Under `Kernel hacking', enable timepegs
  and `Interrupt latency'.  Make sure you enable IO-APIC
  on Uniprocessor. Rebuild kernel. Reboot.
- Run `tpt' to zero all the counters.
- Use the system for a few minutes in a normal manner
- Run `tpt -s | sort -nr +5'

You'll get something like this:

           do_IRQ.in:0 -> softirq.c:71  6059     7.14  18.56     8.45   51237.71
           do_IRQ.in:0 -> do_IRQ.out:0  255     11.60  16.69    13.47    3437.13
                irq.c:476 -> irq.c:481  1       14.31  14.31    14.31      14.31
              exit.c:384 -> exit.c:418  4        5.94  10.53     8.40      33.63
    ll_rw_blk.c:759 -> ll_rw_blk.c:856  3709      .64   8.96     1.01    3754.22
          3c59x.c:1835 -> 3c59x.c:1855  81405    2.53   8.63     2.92  238321.05
                ide.c:513 -> ide.c:522  3709      .52   8.10     1.42    5300.37
                irq.c:523 -> irq.c:542  1        7.14   7.14     7.14       7.14
          signal.c:528 -> signal.c:546  13       1.95   6.10     4.22      55.00
  page_alloc.c:181 -> page_alloc.c:198  4407      .41   5.86      .75    3355.55
            sched.c:541 -> sched.c:596  8238      .35   5.22     1.22   10055.84
          skbuff.c:121 -> skbuff.c:123  206065    .32   5.03      .36   74765.68
          signal.c:602 -> signal.c:604  17       1.28   5.03     2.91      49.63
              dev.c:1127 -> dev.c:1139  43268     .34   4.86      .41   17836.39
            sched.c:713 -> sched.c:748  5497      .31   4.78     1.10    6055.92
         ll_rw_blk.c:377 -> ide.c:1357  78        .93   4.63     3.36     262.83
            timer.c:205 -> timer.c:209  43465     .33   4.61      .43   19044.11
            slab.c:1298 -> slab.c:1322  129153    .32   4.59      .39   51402.35

So the worst interrupt latency path on this machine was 18 usecs,
from the entry into do_IRQ to the enabling of interrupts in do_softirq.
Traversed 6059 times, min,max,avg=7,18,8 usecs.  Aggregate irq
blockage 51 msecs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2001-02-06 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-06  5:29 Linux interrupt latency Mark Spencer
2001-02-06  6:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-02-06 14:04   ` Steve Underwood
2001-02-06 14:15     ` Alan Cox
2001-02-06 14:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A800B14.53490EA3@uow.edu.au \
    --to=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=jim@lambdatel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markster@linux-support.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.