All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Ville Herva <vherva@mail.niksula.cs.hut.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:08:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A8BB89C.581BC524@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010208135606.F2223@viasys.com> <3A8296E3.FC1EE707@redhat.com> <20010208181601.H2223@viasys.com> <20010215125735.C1147@niksula.cs.hut.fi>

Ville Herva wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed:
> > > Ville Herva wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is
> > > > still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a
> > > > second:
> > > >
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec offset 31
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error during data in phase
> > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1)   CRC error in intermediate CRC packet
> > >
> > > Check your cables, especially the connector on the card and the drive.  Look
> > > for any possible bent pins.  The message you are seeing is *usually*, but not
> > > always, a legitimate data corruption issue.  It doesn't show up under the
> > > 5.2.1 driver because it limits your Quantum drive to 80MByte/s and that
> > > particular speed doesn't include CRC checking.  On this driver you have to be
> > > running at 160MByte/s before CRC checking is enabled.
> >
> > I checked the cables. I think HP didn't supply proper 160 MB/S capable
> > cables (aren't those the ones with wattlings?). When I forced the drive to
> > 80MB/s from bios, not only did aic7xxx/ac6 work like charm, but the BIOS
> > also found the "missing" MBR. Stupid problem ;).
> 
> Umm, I think I said that too early. I begun to have problem even during
> boot; the scsi bios did recognize the drive, but the bios didn't find the
> boot record. This was completely cured by forcing the drive to 80MB/s mode.
> So I think the cable wasn't Ultra160 capable.
> 
> However, the 2.4.1ac6, 2.4.1ac2 and 2.19pre6 aic7xxx.c still had trouble
> with the drive. I went back to 80MB/s, 40MB/s and even 20MB/s, but that
> still didn't help. 2.4.1* reported time out while waiting for a command and
> would go into an endless loop resetting the bus. 2.2.19pre6 said there was
> an error during the data in phase, but after some coughing it booted up and
> seemed to work quite alright.
> 
> NT4 booted up without and visible problems.
> 
> The HP service guy changed the motherboard (integrated scsi) the cable (to
> another (80MB/s one), and the drive logics, but that didn't help.
> 
> The problems first started after the motherboard was first changed (due to
> separate problem.) The new one had newer bios and scsi bios.
> 
> Anyhow, I just compiled 2.4.1ac13 with Justin Gibbs's aic7xxx, and it does
> not suffer of any problem at 80MB/s.

There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac
kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7.  I would be curious to know if it worked on
your machine properly.

-- 

 Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>  http://people.redhat.com/dledford
      Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
                      e-mailing me about problems

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-15 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-08 11:56 Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6 Ville Herva
2001-02-08 12:53 ` Doug Ledford
2001-02-08 16:16   ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 10:57     ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 11:08       ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2001-02-15 11:22         ` Ville Herva
2001-02-15 12:11           ` Ville Herva
2001-02-16 11:40             ` Ville Herva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A8BB89C.581BC524@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vherva@mail.niksula.cs.hut.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.