From: Mircea Ciocan <mirceac@interplus.ro>
To: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Can I have my loop FS back, plizzz !!!
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:48:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A8F9A6E.E44261AF@interplus.ro> (raw)
2.4.1ac18 and loop-4 doesn't mix at all well, it didn't even compile (
understandably (sp?) if we think that a large hunk of loop.c is
rejected, and by studing the reject it seem to me that the original
version and loop-4 are going in differend directions :( ).
So, lacking the skills to fix-it myself I'll try a new INNOVATIVE
approach: "Begging the Developers (TM:)" that was reported to give
excelent results in the past:
" Can I have my lil'ol loop FS back, plizzzz, plizzzz, I need it badly
but also I need the other improvements in ac18, I know you are busy with
other important things, but pleeez ( innocent look :)"
And it remains to see if once again this method gives results ;)))).
Mircea "too many bad loops" C.
reply other threads:[~2001-02-18 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A8F9A6E.E44261AF@interplus.ro \
--to=mirceac@interplus.ro \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.