From: Fabio Riccardi <fabio@chromium.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux scheduler limitations?
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:19:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AC3A6C9.991472C0@chromium.com> (raw)
Hello,
I'm working on an enhanced version of Apache and I'm hitting my head
against something I don't understand.
I've found a (to me) unexplicable system behaviour when the number of
Apache forked instances goes somewhere beyond 1050, the machine
suddently slows down almost top a halt and becomes totally unresponsive,
until I stop the test (SpecWeb).
Profiling the kernel shows that the scheduler and the interrupt handler
are taking most of the CPU time.
I understand that there must be a limit to the number of processes that
the scheduler can efficiently handle, but I would expect some sort of
gradual performance degradation when increasing the number of tasks,
instead I observe that by increasing Apache's MaxClient linit by as
little as 10 can cause a sudden transition between smooth working with
lots (30-40%) of CPU idle to a total lock-up.
Moreover the max number of processes is not even constant. If I increase
the server load gradually then I manage to have 1500 processes running
with no problem, but if the transition is sharp (the SpecWeb case) than
I end-up having a lock up.
Anybody seen this before? Any clues?
- Fabio
next reply other threads:[~2001-03-29 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-29 21:19 Fabio Riccardi [this message]
2001-03-29 21:26 ` linux scheduler limitations? David Lang
2001-03-29 21:55 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-30 1:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-03-30 2:58 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-29 21:35 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-03-29 22:12 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-29 22:33 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-03-29 22:51 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-30 6:52 ` Giuliano Pochini
2001-04-02 22:58 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AC3A6C9.991472C0@chromium.com \
--to=fabio@chromium.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.