From: Praveen Rajendran <rp@sasken.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux timer performance ?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:10:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADF4D47.7B9B5EFD@sasken.com> (raw)
hi
I am working on a kernel module which requires the addition of a large
number of kernel timers to expire statistical values ( including time
) maintained in a table.
One alternative would be to use a single timer and traverse the entire
table and use the existing system time to expire the values ( comparing
it with the time already stored in the table )when the timer expires .
Following the method I describe first I would have to add a large number
of timers ( around 2000) ... would this cause any significant
performance drop ? which method should I use ?
thanks in advance
Praveen
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-19 20:40 Praveen Rajendran [this message]
2001-04-19 16:19 ` linux timer performance ? Jeremy Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADF4D47.7B9B5EFD@sasken.com \
--to=rp@sasken.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.