From: Tom Otake <totake66@home.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm deadlock with 2.4.x kernel?
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 17:35:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B01AF42.C171FE86@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010515094004.B468@66bassett.freeserve.co.uk
Yes, I've been able to recreate the second hang scenario, though I have to
admit it wasn't exactly the same. I started the copy of the data, created a
new LV, which worked. I ran mkreiserfs on the new LV, it worked. I removed
the new LV, also worked, then ran pvscan. That's when the system hung. All
the while, the copy from CD to disk was going on.
I apologize if I sound like an idiot but I've never taken a stack trace for
the linux kernel. I assume this will require enabling magic sysrq. I looked
through the sysrq.txt but it didn't offer too much help, especially on how to
save stack traces, etc. Would it be possible to get a quick rundown on what
commands/keys I need to use to get the data you need?
Thanks
Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 05:11:47PM -0500, Tom Otake wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this has been brought up yet. Over the weekend, my
> > Linux hung up on me twice. Considering that this never happened before
> > and only two things have recently changed (LVM and ReiserFS) , I did
> > some reading and came across the bug report for LVM on sistina's website
> > about LVM deadlocking Linux.
>
> All the deadlocking issues have been due to either running snapshots
> on 2.2 kernels or doing a 'pvmove' on 2.2 or 2.4. It doesn't sound
> like you were doing either.
>
> >
> > I'm running kernle 2.4.3 with LVM compiled into the kernel. LVM is
> > 0.9.1_beta7, reiser is 3.x.0j. All essential fs (/, /usr, /var, /tmp)
> > are still using ext2 and linux partitions, non essential fs (/home
> > amongst others) are all on reiserfs with LVM, excluding /usr/local,
> > which is still on ext2 and Linux partition.
> >
> > The first occurance:
> > Running vmware (not on lvm/reiser) while browsing the web using netscape
> > and running seti@home. The system hung on me when I tried to access a
> > web page that appeared to be task intensive, wether servlets,
> > javascript, flash, or something else, I don't know.
>
> I used to get deadlocks from vmware without using LVM.
>
> > The second occurance:
> > I was copying a large amount of data from a CDROM to my home dir (on
> > lvm). While the copy was in progress, I created a new LV. This
> > worked. The system hung when I ran mkreiserfs on the new LV.
>
> This sounds more serious. Can you reproduce it ? If you can the
> quickest way for us to find the problem is for you to build the kernel
> with kdb and get stack traces for the relevent threads.
>
> > As I said, I'm not sure if the system hang was caused by the deadlock,
> > since the system was dead. If this is related to the deadlock issue,
> > are there any possible workarounds, besides being mindful of the system
> > load?
>
> I am not aware of any deadlock issues in beta7. Has anyone else
> experienced problems ?
>
> - Joe
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
--
_______________
Love cannot be much younger than the lust for murder.
-- Sigmund Freud
-- Tom Otake
-- totake66_nospam@home.com
-- Remove _nospam
-- #550
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-15 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-14 22:11 [linux-lvm] lvm deadlock with 2.4.x kernel? Tom Otake
2001-05-15 8:40 ` Joe Thornber
2001-05-15 22:35 ` Tom Otake [this message]
2001-05-15 22:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-15 23:14 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-16 0:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-16 1:17 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-16 1:50 ` Jay Weber
2001-05-16 3:35 ` Jay Weber
2001-05-16 8:39 ` Joe Thornber
2001-05-16 10:50 ` Jay Weber
2001-05-16 11:06 ` Joe Thornber
2001-05-16 10:53 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-05-16 13:20 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-17 2:26 ` Tom Otake
2001-05-17 15:31 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B01AF42.C171FE86@home.com \
--to=totake66@home.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.