From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>
To: "Martin.Knoblauch" <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:55:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B0A99E7.467CE534@transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B0A28C0.2FFFC935@TeraPort.de> <3B0A3794.15BDF9D6@TeraPort.de>
"Martin.Knoblauch" wrote:
>
> After some checking, I could have made the answer a bit less terse:
>
> - it would require that the kernel is compiled with cpuid [module]
> support
> - not everybody may want enable this, just for getting one or two
> harmless numbers.
If so, then that's their problem. We're not here to solve the problem of
stupid system administrators.
> - you would need a utility with root permission to analyze the cpuid
> info. The
> cahce info does not seem to be there in clear ascii.
Bullsh*t. /dev/cpu/%d/cpuid is supposed to be mode 444 (world readable.)
> - this limits my script to root users, or you need the setuid-bit on
> the
> utility. Not really good for security.
See above.
> - the cpuid stuff is i386 specific [today]. So are my changes. But
> implementing
> them for other architectures [if there is interest in the info] would
> not
> require to also implement the cpuid on other architectures. Which may
> not make any
> sense at all.
>
> So, having the numbers in clear text in the cpuinfo file looks simpler
> and safer to me, although reading /dev/cpu/*/cpuinfo maybe more
> versatile [on i386] - at some cost.
>
> Question: are there any utilities or other uses for the cpuid device
> today? Just interested. The kernel seems to work well without it.
That is usually the case with devices -- the kernel doesn't care, why
would it?
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-22 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-22 8:52 [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 9:55 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2001-05-22 18:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 23:57 ` Martin Knoblauch
2001-05-23 0:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-23 0:18 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-23 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 9:24 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-23 1:48 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 7:10 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 16:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-21 12:39 Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-21 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-22 2:59 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-22 3:22 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 4:44 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-22 11:15 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 22:47 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-22 23:43 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 23:50 ` Martin Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B0A99E7.467CE534@transmeta.com \
--to=hpa@transmeta.com \
--cc=Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.