All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Riccardi <fabio@chromium.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.org>
Cc: "Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac2
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:55:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B1436DC.60869CFB@chromium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DD0DC14935B1D211981A00105A1B28DB033ED2F0@NL-ASD-EXCH-1> <3B13542A.5DBA3903@chromium.com> <20010529121954.J26871@suse.de>

yes I get a performance improvement of about 5%

could you port your patches to the 2.4.5-ac4 kernel? I'd love to see if the ac
improvements and yours add to each other.

 Thanks,

 - Fabio

Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Tue, May 29 2001, Fabio Riccardi wrote:
> > "Leeuw van der, Tim" wrote:
> >
> > > But the claim was that 2.4.5-ac2 is faster than 2.4.5 plain, so which
> > > changes are in 2.4.5-ac2 that would make it faster than 2.4.5 plain? Also, I
> > > don't know if 2.4.5-ac1 is as fast as 2.4.5-ac2 for Fabio. If not, then it's
> > > a change in the 2.4.5-ac2 changelog. If it is as fast, it is one of the
> > > changes in the 2.4.5-ac1 changelog.
> >
> > 2.4.5-ac1 crashed on my machine, vanilla 2.4.5 worked but slower than 2.4.2
> >
> > 2.4.5-ac2 is _a lot_ faster than all the 2.4.4 and of vanilla 2.4.5
> >
> > please notice that I have a 4G machine, dual proc, and I run a very
> > memory/IO/CPU intensive test, so your mileage may vary with different
> > applications.
>
> Could you try the 4GB I/O patches and see if they boost performance of
> such cases?
>
> *.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/2.4.5/
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-29 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-28 15:19 Linux 2.4.5-ac2 Leeuw van der, Tim
2001-05-28 16:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-28 20:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-28 19:38   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-28 21:42     ` André Dahlqvist
2001-05-28 22:10       ` André Dahlqvist
2001-05-28 21:15         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-28 23:44           ` André Dahlqvist
2001-05-29  4:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-29  7:47 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-05-29 10:19   ` Jens Axboe
2001-05-29 23:55     ` Fabio Riccardi [this message]
2001-05-30  9:29       ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-28  0:33 Alan Cox
2001-05-28  3:38 ` Tom Vier
2001-05-28  5:32   ` Tom Vier
2001-05-28  3:44 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-05-28 13:37   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B1436DC.60869CFB@chromium.com \
    --to=fabio@chromium.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.