From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0E8482A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:54:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B181D15.3D162B59@hp.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 18:54:13 -0400 From: Chuck Slivkoff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Upgrade path from 0.6 to 0.9? References: <3B180D83.F5479D0B@hp.com> <20010601225956.K7349@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:47:47PM -0400, Chuck Slivkoff wrote: > > I'm thinking I need to update the kernel, but I'd like to not have to > > reload this from scratch. I can pull the kernel from the 0.9 ISO, but > > PALO didn't seem to be too intuitive. > > You do have to update your kernel in order to run glibc 2.2.3, due to > the changes in how stacks are managed for threads. I don't think palo > is too unintuitive... RTFM, I know. I updated the kernel from the ISO image (mounted via loopback on a RH 7.0 system) and I was able to fix the problem I was having. I added the ISO image to "sources.list" & have "apt-get upgrade" running so far without a hitch. Wahoo! -chuck P.S. The confustion I had about PALO, was wether or not it needed to be run (like LILO) after changing /boot/vmlinux. The answer, BTW, is "no".