From: Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 06:56:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B1CC8D5.9F227A36@wrkhors.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010604190123.C2560@pc.ilinx
> > Just curious, /boot only needs to be like 100 megs tops why would you want
> > that to be an LV. Isn't it more trouble than it's worth?
>
> If nothing else, how about "on principle"? :-) Seriously though, I
> want to abandon screwing around with MS-DOS partitions and use LVs
> instead. They just make so much better sense than partitions.
It is seriously less hassle to have the root volume (with /boot
on it) as a simple file system. Main point is that any error
in LVM will prevent you from booting to the point where you can
come up far enough to clean up the LVM system. "Doable" and
"make sense" aren't necessarly the same thing. If you want to
use LVM for nearly everything create a 128MB root, 64MB swap and
few-hundred MB /var and use the 4th partition as pv00. This
will usually get you far enough up to fix anything that gets
broken. Until the PC BIOS mfr's include a sane boot system w/
console prompt that allows you to boot w/o LVM for damaged system
this will be much safer.
--
Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer St.
Chicago, IL 60647
lembark@wrkhors.com 800-762-1582
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-05 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-04 8:07 [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-04 14:21 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-06-05 2:01 ` Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-05 11:56 ` Steven Lembark [this message]
2001-06-05 15:48 ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-05 18:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-06 4:07 ` Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-07 15:30 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 15:43 ` Jack McKinney
[not found] ` <20010607182636.H3232@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-07 16:32 ` Jack McKinney
[not found] ` <20010607191649.R3232@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-07 19:18 ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-07 16:39 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2001-06-07 21:20 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-08 2:27 ` Russell Coker
2001-06-07 21:18 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 21:36 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 21:37 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 21:52 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 22:15 ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-07 22:24 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 22:27 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 22:23 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-08 2:28 ` Russell Coker
2001-06-08 2:26 ` Russell Coker
2001-06-07 22:29 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-06-07 22:38 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 21:08 ` Michael Tokarev
[not found] ` <20010608153036.G21909@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-11 0:04 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-06-11 0:10 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-11 0:20 ` Michael Tokarev
2001-06-11 11:39 ` Russell Coker
2001-06-07 15:26 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-05 18:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-04 17:56 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B1CC8D5.9F227A36@wrkhors.com \
--to=lembark@wrkhors.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.