From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:17:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B28D570.F757DEF8@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B273A20.8EE88F8F@vnet.ibm.com> <3B28C6C1.3477493F@mandrakesoft.com> <p05100306b74e83f6860f@[207.213.214.37]>
Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> At 10:14 AM -0400 2001-06-14, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >According to the PCI spec it is -impossible- to have more than 256 buses
> >on a single "hose", so you simply have to implement multiple hoses, just
> >like Alpha (and Sparc64?) already do. That's how the hardware is forced
> >to implement it...
>
> That's right, of course. A small problem is that dev->slot_name
> becomes ambiguous, since it doesn't have any hose identification. Nor
> does it have any room for the hose id; it's fixed at 8 chars, and
> fully used (bb:dd.f\0).
Ouch. Good point. Well, extending that field's size shouldn't break
anything except binary modules (which IMHO means, it doesn't break
anything).
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-14 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-13 10:02 Going beyond 256 PCI buses Tom Gall
2001-06-13 17:17 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-13 18:29 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-14 14:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 14:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 14:42 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 15:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 17:59 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 19:03 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:50 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 20:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 18:01 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 18:47 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:04 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 19:12 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 20:14 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 21:35 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:12 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 22:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:49 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 23:35 ` VGA handling was [Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses] James Simmons
2001-06-14 23:42 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:55 ` James Simmons
2001-06-15 15:14 ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-15 2:06 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-15 8:52 ` Matan Ziv-Av
2001-06-16 21:32 ` Going beyond 256 PCI buses Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 23:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-15 8:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-15 15:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:13 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 15:15 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:17 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B28D570.F757DEF8@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=jlundell@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.