From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:45:17 -0400 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:14974 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:45:11 -0400 Message-ID: <3B37943B.AC711DB0@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:42:51 -0700 From: LA Walsh X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, en-US, en-GB, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: user limits for 'security'? In-Reply-To: <3B379058.FF66AF14@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I suppose another question related to the first, is 'limit' checking part of the 'standard linux security' that embedded Linux users might find to be a waste of precious code-space? -l -- The above thoughts and | I know I don't know the opinions writings are my own. | of every part of my company. :-) L A Walsh, law at sgi.com | Sr Eng, Trust Technology 01-650-933-5338 | Core Linux, SGI