From: "Brian J. Watson" <Brian.J.Watson@compaq.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.7] generic hash table implementation
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:05:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B65DA0E.9736346D@compaq.com> (raw)
> Thanks to everyone who participated in the 'Common hash table implementation'
> thread. With your comments in mind, I molded Richard's code into something
> that might work for the kernel community (and Linus).
>
> Included in the following patch are the generic hash implementation,
> documentation, and some test code. The test code will be stripped out when
> it's time to submit the patch for inclusion. To turn on the test code, set
> HASH_TEST to 1.
>
> Before submitting, we probably want to port one or more kernel hash tables
> onto the generic implementation. I was thinking about porting the dcache
> sometime next week if I have time, then running it on my laptop to see if
> there's any problems.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
Sorry. My last message had a bogus reply address (bwatson@sandbass.cpqcorp.net). I'm used to using Netscape mail, but since Netscape has no good
way to send inline patches unscathed, I used the mail command. I forgot that mail wouldn't know to use my correct reply address, and instead
would use the account name on my laptop.
To make a long story short, my correct reply address is Brian.J.Watson@compaq.com. Please copy me if you have comments about my adaptation of
Richard's generic hash implementation.
--
Brian Watson | "The common people of England... so
Linux Kernel Developer | jealous of their liberty, but like the
Open SSI Clustering Project | common people of most other countries
Compaq Computer Corp | never rightly considering wherein it
Los Angeles, CA | consists..."
| -Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, 1776
mailto:Brian.J.Watson@compaq.com
http://opensource.compaq.com/
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-30 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-30 22:05 Brian J. Watson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-27 2:43 [PATCH 2.4.7] generic hash table implementation Brian J. Watson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B65DA0E.9736346D@compaq.com \
--to=brian.j.watson@compaq.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bpringle@sympatico.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.