From: David Ford <david@blue-labs.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Any known ext2 FS problems in 2.4.7?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 23:35:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B6B6D89.90804@blue-labs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200108032301.f73N18E01809@lynx.adilger.int>
Yes I'm sure, this machine has been running for a long time quite well
save the reported problems.
a) fsck on boot, yes
b) manual fsck and reboot every few days, yes
c) fstab is correct :P
d) missing space isn't account for in du, lsof, or any other tool that
i'm aware of
e) 4.5 gigs is a lot of space to eat over a couple days, particularly
when this server's disk use varies by a couple hundred megs per day
f) only the e2fs partition has problems, the other partitions are fine,
no journal replays or otherwise
After a fresh clean fsck'd start, the machine runs fine for a day or
two, then in about one day disk space grinds away. Bringing it to
single user mode with nothing running but the kernel threads and a few
init children, lsof shows nothing but a few libs open, and no deleted or
otherwise open for write files.
All my other machines run fine. Also note as I said, it only does this
under 2.4.7, if I boot into 2.4.5 it will stay up for weeks until the
reported-and-fixed OOPs kills it. No disk space issues there.
David
Andreas Dilger wrote:
>David Ford writes:
>
>>I'm starting to go through a cycle every 2-3 days where I have to bring
>>one particular machine down to init l1, kill any processes and remount
>>RO, then run e2fsck on the e2fs partition. Over that period of time,
>>disk space is eaten without accouting. 'du' shows about 13 gigs used
>>when I sum up all the directories. Roughly 4.5 gigs is missing. During
>>e2fsck, there are many many pages of deleted inodes with zero dtime, ref
>>count fixups, and free inode count fixups. When I say many, I mean that
>>this pIII 667 scrolls for about four minutes...
>>
>>There is nothing special about this partition, it doesn't do it while
>>running 2.4.5-ac15, but I can't use that kernel either because it OOPSes
>>as I reported. That OOPS was fixed for 2.4.7, but this disk space issue
>>is rather frustrating. Fortunately all my other systems are reiserfs
>>and work fine.
>>
>>/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 on / type ext2
>>(rw,usrquota=/usr/local/admin/system-info/quota-home)
>>
>>I haven't mucked with any /proc settings other than "16384"
>> >/proc/sys/fs/file-max. It's also worthy to note that this machine
>>also likes to break and spontaneously reboot about once every day. No
>>klog, no console, no nothing, just bewm. Again 2.4.5 didn't do this.
>>
>
>Are you sure you are running e2fsck on this partition at boot time?
>I mean, if it is rebooting spontaneously every day, but you need to run
>e2fsck manually to clean up the filesystem every 2-3 days, the fsck after
>reboot should already clean up the filesystem for you. If you _don't_
>run e2fsck on this filesystem (you need a non-zero number in the 6th
>column of /etc/fstab) that would explain the problem.
>
>The "missing space" you are seeing is because files are being held open
>(thus not reported by "du", which only can check linked files, but reported
>by "df" which shows the whole filesystem stats). If the files are held
>open at the time of a crash, then you need to run e2fsck to clean up all
>of these "orphans". You should be able to see what process is causing this
>by running "lsof | grep deleted" to find open-but-deleted files.
>
>Note that reiserfs still has the same problem (AFAIK, I don't think it
>is fixed in the stock kernels, although there is a patch available),
>so even though it doesn't _need_ reiserfsck at boot time, you still
>don't get the space back until it is run. If the other machines don't
>crash all the time, the space won't be "lost", so you may not notice it.
>Ext3 cleans up orphans at boot time (no fsck needed).
>
>Cheers, Andreas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-04 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-03 17:40 Any known ext2 FS problems in 2.4.7? David Ford
2001-08-03 23:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-04 3:35 ` David Ford [this message]
2001-08-04 7:14 ` David Ford
2001-08-04 23:32 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B6B6D89.90804@blue-labs.org \
--to=david@blue-labs.org \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.