From: "John L. Males" <software_iq@TheOffice.net>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re[03]: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile Attempts
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 23:06:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B6C7FEC.14087.6EC6D3@localhost> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Keith,
I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to make your reply. I
am sorry I forgot to mention I am not on the mailing list. I just
discovered your reply a few minutes ago.
I had prior to sending the original message searched on the internet
for what I "needed" to know to proceed in my attempts. I am said to
say at that time nothing in the many, and I did read many of the
results litterally, about the programs I needed to update to that
make be part of issue.
Two days ago I did more and more searching and happened along some
links, text files, and in fact the very file you referred to in your
reply online. I then proceeded to get the SuSE varients I needed.
Suffice to say the SuSE source RPMs had their share of problems in
being compiled. In end after my tinkering of the SuSE source RPMs I
managed to start up a 2.4.7 SuSE varient. I have not gone back to
trying to compile the pre-patch kernel source I had problems with
originally. The reason is simple, the memory observations I was
keenly interested in indicated some possible issues.
I have since send to the Kernel Mailing list my initial observations
and a request on how I may be able to get the metric information on
Kernel/Application memory use. That of course is a different issue
and discussion from the eMail you were so kind to make a reply.
Again I want to thank you or the time you took to reply and pointing
me to where I should look for the solution. I do tend to read
documentation much more than most, but sometimes I miss something or
look in wrong place. In this case I looked in wrong places combined
with me still learning some of the "finer" points of such Linux
activities as compiling the Kernel. I at least now in event I forget
to mention in future that I am not on the Kernel mailing list the
mailing list archives are timely in their updates.
Keith I really appreciate your feedback and time to answer. I cannot
express this enough given my failure to indicate I was not on the
mailing list, nor aware how frequent the list archive may be updated
so I can find out if any replies were made to the list.
Regards,
John L. Males
Software I.Q. Consulting
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
04 August 2001 23:06
mailto:software_iq@TheOffice.net
mailto:jlmales@softhome.net
======================================================
======================================================
Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile
Attempts
From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 04:29:09 EST
Next message: DH: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: eepro100 2.4.7-ac3
problems (apm related)"
In reply to: John L. Males: "Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile
Attempts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:31:25 -0500,
"John L. Males" <software_iq@TheOffice.net> wrote:
>Without giving the gory details, I am curious to know if there are
>still problems compiling the 2.4.8-pre2 kernel (2.4.7 + 2.4.8-pre2
>patch).... Also what is installed in /lib/modules
>tree is not just modules, but some extensive set of the kernel
>source tree with object code mixed in for adventure of finding.
>
>Am I completely out to lunch
>here, or should I just hang in. I am doing ok with the 2.2.19
You are out to lunch, or rather your programs are. Upgrade all your
utilities to the values listed in Documentation/Changes.
- -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Next message: DH: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: eepro100 2.4.7-ac3
problems (apm related)"
In reply to: John L. Males: "Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile
Attempts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 -
21:00:50 EST
======================================================
======================================================
Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile Attempts
From: John L. Males (software_iq@TheOffice.net)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 02:31:25 EST
Next message: Subhash S: "Question about gettimeofday"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: laptops and journalling
filesystems"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2
Compile Attempts"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile
Attempts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Without giving the gory details, I am curious to know if there are
still problems compiling the 2.4.8-pre2 kernel (2.4.7 + 2.4.8-pre2
patch). Specifically the "make modules" does not complete dues to
some errors, the kernel compiles, but will not start after it is
decompressed, if one uses the "-k -i" options of make for the modules
to skip those that are really not a big concern to me anyway, there
seems to be problems with "make modules_install" either not working
or some other strange thing. Also what is installed in /lib/modules
tree is not just modules, but some extensive set of the kernel source
tree with object code mixed in for adventure of finding.
All I really wanted to do was give the 2.4.8pre2 kernel a try to see
if memory management was improved with the recent approaches. I did
try a prior 2.4 kernel, not sure, but think it was 2.4.4 and it had
its share of compile problems via make. Am I completely out to lunch
here, or should I just hang in. I am doing ok with the 2.2.19 Linus
Kernel with the Openwall patch, but I really would like to observe
the work in memory management of the kernel to determine if may
observations on how memory is management in the bigger picture to
determine if I wish to offer my observations to the memory management
discussion.
Regards,
John L. Males
Software I.Q. Consulting
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
31 July 2001 02:31
mailto:software_iq@TheOffice.net
mailto:jlmales@softhome.net
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO2ZeyfLzhJbmoDZ+EQLWMQCeJCO8ncZ8WW51ufl+CWt2oLhDsmoAnj4U
XmokefDd3smnPvFBdoO9wdDd
=XX0U
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Next message: Subhash S: "Question about gettimeofday"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: laptops and journalling
filesystems"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2
Compile Attempts"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile
Attempts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 -
21:00:49 EST
======================================================
======================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO2zGNvLzhJbmoDZ+EQKvJgCg4FzcCr27OpVPF86eDGGTHeY2ydAAoKkn
ryghyVumGdLXvI5elJ3PXszR
=N83o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
reply other threads:[~2001-08-05 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B6C7FEC.14087.6EC6D3@localhost \
--to=software_iq@theoffice.net \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.