From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:27:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:27:16 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:5360 "HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:27:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3B7024EE.D58E6BF@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 18:27:10 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat, Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-0.9smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Gooch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] one of $BIGNUM devfs races In-Reply-To: <200108070517.f775HEw30547@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <200108071709.f77H9GD05198@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Gooch wrote: > Finally, a spinlock is less code (0) and faster on UP. Ehm not if you require protection against IRQ events......