From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f7HJKdE10102 for linux-mips-outgoing; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:20:39 -0700 Received: from artilemicro.com ([209.243.128.35]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7HJKbj10099 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:20:37 -0700 Received: from taec.com (sunrise [209.243.129.241]) by artilemicro.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA13055; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B7D6E7B.9994255@taec.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:20:27 -0700 From: Hua Wen Organization: Artile Microsystems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: zh-CN, en, zh, zh-TW MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jun Sun CC: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Upgrade kernel from release 2.2 to 2.4.? References: <3B7D5513.F10F35A1@taec.com> <3B7D57E4.D7B14D63@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Thank you very much, Jun. One more thing -- we've made quite some changes in 2.2.1 so I wonder what would be the best way to upgrade. I'm thinking: 1> check out new kernel, use "merge directories" function from emacs, or 2> use "cvs import" to import the new kernel to our local cvs repository, then merge with our local changes by "cvs update/co -j".. Any comments/suggestions? Thanks! -Hua > > > > We made changes to linux/MIPS kernel 2.2.1 for our > > system and it's been running well so far. We now > > plan to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.X. The question > > is: > > > > Which sub release of 2.4 is more stable and is > > recommended to use? > > > > I suggest you use the latest CVS head. So far it is usually the head that has > the most bug fixes, and really not much dramatic stuff introduced. > > Jun