From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Filling holes in ext2
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B854186.F0C00E3C@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B83E9FD.6020801@humboldt.co.uk> <3B83FB3F.A0BDC056@zip.com.au> <3B853BE6.3010703@humboldt.co.uk>
Adrian Cox wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > It matters. -ac kernels handle this by clearing out the blocks
> > on the error path in __block_prepare_write(). If you retest with
> > -ac kernels, you should just see zeroes.
>
> That doesn't help. The problem occurs just the same on -ac kernels.
OK, that code is for IO errors and disk-full.
> In this case __block_prepare_write() is successful. What happens is that
> if __copy_from_user() fails, the block remains mapped but not up to
> date. Thus the next read access to the file fetches the garbage data off
> disk, and presents it to the user.
generic_file_write() will mark the page not up-to-date in this case.
I wonder what's actually going on? Perhaps the fact that we've
instantiated a block in ext2 outside i_size?
If you change the error path in -ac's generic_file_write() thusly:
- goto fail_write;
+ status = -EFAULT;
+ goto sync_failure;
does it fix it?
Can you send the code you're using to demonstrate this?
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-23 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-22 17:21 Filling holes in ext2 Adrian Cox
2001-08-22 18:34 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-22 18:59 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:22 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2001-08-23 19:17 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 19:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-23 21:21 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:47 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B854186.F0C00E3C@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=adrian@humboldt.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.